From: quiliro@riseup.net
To: "libreplanet-discuss" <libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>
Subject: Re: No, Stallman isn't "nuts" nor does he deserve less freedom of speech
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:18:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b523cf957278712c82c2059feae1bd09.squirrel@sm.riseup.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMkzgA6Z3AGeU5O7gObb+WZr8uCcs9WgFk3qyn=HZ8mAmu8wiA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, September 15, 2019 9:07 pm, Eric Schultz wrote:
> None of this anything to do with free software. It has nothing to do with
> the practical response to the PR crisis caused by RMS' continued refusal
> to
> act like a responsible human being.
>
> This entire discussion today proved the worst of the FSF to be completely
> true. I'm pretty much done with this organization since it's rotten from
> the President, a majority of the board down to seemingly a major portion
> of
> it's supporters. It's proof that a large portion of the FSF supporters are
> in the RMS worship movement a lot more than they're in the free software
> movement.
>
> FSF, GNU and sadly the GPL are likely doomed unless there is massive
> change
> immediately. Based on just this discussion, it seems there's no chance of
> that change. Once the free software movement is fatally wounded, I hope
> many of the people here can take comfort that they got a chance to debate
> the finer points of what is child sexual assault and to parse in
> excruciating detail the reprehensible statements of RMS.
>
> Eric
>
> PS: if you disagree, don't contact me. You and I aren't in the same
> movement; you're not in the free software movement, you're in the RMS
> worship movement.
If you do not back you statements on facts, you are making personal
attacks on all of us. Please cite proof for every sentence.
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-15 17:35 Is Stallman nuts? MARY-ANNE WOLF
2019-09-15 18:01 ` lily via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 18:37 ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-15 20:20 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-15 20:34 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-15 20:45 ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-15 20:59 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-16 0:53 ` No, Stallman isn't "nuts" nor does he deserve less freedom of speech J.B. Nicholson
2019-09-16 1:47 ` Steven Sullam
2019-09-16 2:35 ` Taking credit for your own choices and free software is neither anti-commercial nor anti-profit J.B. Nicholson
2019-09-16 10:19 ` No, Stallman isn't "nuts" nor does he deserve less freedom of speech Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 10:29 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 10:33 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 14:41 ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-16 16:40 ` 'smee via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 2:07 ` Eric Schultz
2019-09-17 0:18 ` quiliro [this message]
2019-09-17 6:50 ` Ole Aamot
2019-09-16 15:03 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-20 17:26 ` Is Stallman nuts? Will Hill
2019-09-20 18:26 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-21 22:33 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 18:37 ` C. Cossé
2019-09-15 20:41 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 18:46 ` Michael Downey
2019-09-15 19:40 ` MARY-ANNE WOLF
2019-09-15 19:54 ` Federico klez Culloca
2019-09-15 20:30 ` TechLibre
2019-09-15 20:37 ` Betsy Garrett
2019-09-15 20:44 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 20:49 ` TechLibre
2019-09-15 20:53 ` Andrew Luke Nesbit
2019-09-15 19:34 ` TechLibre
2019-09-15 19:41 ` Robert Call (Bob)
2019-09-15 20:30 ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-15 22:14 ` Mark Phelan
2019-09-16 11:54 ` Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott
2019-09-16 14:54 ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-16 16:36 ` Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott
2019-09-16 21:11 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-16 17:49 ` Deb Nicholson
2019-09-16 20:08 ` alimiracle
2019-09-17 13:50 ` quiliro
2019-09-17 14:22 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-17 17:04 ` Ole Aamot
2019-09-17 18:03 ` quiliro
2019-09-17 18:29 ` Danny Spitzberg
2019-09-17 19:35 ` 'smee via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-17 20:37 ` quiliro
2019-09-22 3:47 ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-17 18:47 ` lily via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-17 19:13 ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-17 19:23 ` Aaron Wolf
2019-09-17 21:13 ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-17 23:29 ` A. Mani
2019-09-19 4:34 ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-19 11:52 ` A. Mani
2019-09-19 14:32 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-20 4:47 ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-18 5:30 ` Joel Holder
2019-09-17 19:22 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-17 20:27 ` quiliro
2019-09-18 0:00 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18 0:03 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18 0:04 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18 0:23 ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-18 0:59 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18 1:12 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-18 4:35 ` quiliro
2019-09-18 5:28 ` Isaac David
2019-09-18 15:42 ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-18 23:13 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-19 1:57 ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-19 0:25 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-19 0:28 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-19 0:37 ` Diplomatic activism [was Re: Is Stallman nuts?] Aaron Wolf
2019-09-21 19:52 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18 23:44 ` Is Stallman nuts? Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-19 0:31 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b523cf957278712c82c2059feae1bd09.squirrel@sm.riseup.net \
--to=quiliro@riseup.net \
--cc=libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).