LibrePlanet discussion list archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lord <lord@basiscraft.com>
To: "Adrienne G. Thompson" <adriennegayethompson@gmail.com>
Cc: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: Re: Is Stallman nuts?
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:45:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0219be5bf933a4a7b4fd1dadfd25757a@basiscraft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvtE5F8ocUR-uHcKwSfnob60c3c1AiHfr1c+NMBmj8k=G0TvQ@mail.gmail.com>

I wanted to express my strong agreement with this, from Adrienne G.
Thompson, part very strongly:

> "The fact that a young woman might have presented herself as "willing" does not absolve the alleged offender of rape if he knew - or in the case of someone of Minsky's stature where it would be inferred that he "had a duty to know" - that she was underage."

I would also say that beyond any question of law, men trying to raise
funds and socially network, who find themselves at a lavish, high-money
event, surrounded by women significantly below their age and acting in
these highly sexualized ways ought to be enough to stop those men from
participating further.  I believe the culture at MIT (and Stanford), and
the individual men, are rightly due lots of criticism and perhaps in
some cases prosecution.  

So, thanks Adrienne for opening that line of discussion. 

Nevertheless, the record of what Minsky did or didn't do, and what he
knew or should have known and when is far from clear, and the accusation
of "sexual assault" is indeed not fair.  Nobody is served by being fast
and loose with the facts, here.  There are plenty of solid facts to
protest on! 

-t 

On 2019-09-15 13:20, Adrienne G. Thompson wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 1:38 PM Thomas Lord <lord@basiscraft.com> wrote: 
> 
>> Remarkably, in order to make their allegations against Stallman, both
>> Selam G. and Edward Ongweso Jr. must speak untruthfully about what
>> Stallman wrote.
> 
> Contrary to Stallman's comment that "the word 'assaulting' presumes that he applied force or violence", force or violence is not necessary to constitute rape or "assault". Stallman is not a lawyer. The fact that a young woman might have presented herself as "willing" does not absolve the alleged offender of rape if he knew - or in the case of someone of Minsky's stature where it would be inferred that he "had a duty to know" - that she was underage. 
> 
> Hackers are known to be socially inept. Their humour can often be crude, off-colour and - like the majority of men in the world - totally sexist (I'm convinced that many of the men I know have their balls in their brains:-)  ). 
> 
> The record on Richard Stallman underscores that he is driven by ethical sensibilities. He's not about to approve of rape anytime soon. So let's just tell rms to shut up about the Epstein matter, not to attempt to defend his idols (some of which I, _personally_, know are not worth defending) and to get a female FSF colleague to censor all his comments pertaining to women before these comments go public. 
> 
> Adrienne 
> She/her 
> -- 
> Freedom - no pane, all gaiGN!
> 
> GNU C-Graph - http://www.gnu.org/software/c-graph
> Code Art Now - http://codeartnow.com
> Abertheid Campaign - http://www.abertheid.info
> Follow me on Twitter @AdrienneGT @GNUcgraph
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-15 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-15 17:35 Is Stallman nuts? MARY-ANNE WOLF
2019-09-15 18:01 ` lily via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 18:37 ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-15 20:20   ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-15 20:34     ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-15 20:45     ` Thomas Lord [this message]
2019-09-15 20:59       ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-16  0:53     ` No, Stallman isn't "nuts" nor does he deserve less freedom of speech J.B. Nicholson
2019-09-16  1:47       ` Steven Sullam
2019-09-16  2:35         ` Taking credit for your own choices and free software is neither anti-commercial nor anti-profit J.B. Nicholson
2019-09-16 10:19         ` No, Stallman isn't "nuts" nor does he deserve less freedom of speech Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 10:29           ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 10:33             ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16 14:41               ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-16 16:40               ` 'smee via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-16  2:07       ` Eric Schultz
2019-09-17  0:18         ` quiliro
2019-09-17  6:50         ` Ole Aamot
2019-09-16 15:03       ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-20 17:26     ` Is Stallman nuts? Will Hill
2019-09-20 18:26       ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-21 22:33         ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 18:37 ` C. Cossé
2019-09-15 20:41   ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 18:46 ` Michael Downey
2019-09-15 19:40   ` MARY-ANNE WOLF
2019-09-15 19:54     ` Federico klez Culloca
2019-09-15 20:30     ` TechLibre
2019-09-15 20:37       ` Betsy Garrett
2019-09-15 20:44         ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-15 20:49         ` TechLibre
2019-09-15 20:53         ` Andrew Luke Nesbit
2019-09-15 19:34 ` TechLibre
2019-09-15 19:41 ` Robert Call (Bob)
2019-09-15 20:30 ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-15 22:14 ` Mark Phelan
2019-09-16 11:54 ` Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott
2019-09-16 14:54   ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-16 16:36     ` Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott
2019-09-16 21:11       ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-16 17:49     ` Deb Nicholson
2019-09-16 20:08       ` alimiracle
2019-09-17 13:50 ` quiliro
2019-09-17 14:22   ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-17 17:04     ` Ole Aamot
2019-09-17 18:03       ` quiliro
2019-09-17 18:29         ` Danny Spitzberg
2019-09-17 19:35           ` 'smee via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-17 20:37           ` quiliro
2019-09-22  3:47           ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-17 18:47         ` lily via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-17 19:13           ` Thomas Lord
2019-09-17 19:23           ` Aaron Wolf
2019-09-17 21:13             ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-17 23:29               ` A. Mani
2019-09-19  4:34             ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-19 11:52               ` A. Mani
2019-09-19 14:32                 ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-20  4:47                   ` Richard Stallman
2019-09-18  5:30           ` Joel Holder
2019-09-17 19:22       ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-17 20:27     ` quiliro
2019-09-18  0:00       ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18  0:03         ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18  0:04           ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18  0:23       ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-18  0:59     ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18  1:12       ` Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-18  4:35       ` quiliro
2019-09-18  5:28         ` Isaac David
2019-09-18 15:42           ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-18 23:13             ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-19  1:57               ` Caleb Herbert
2019-09-19  0:25         ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-19  0:28           ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-19  0:37             ` Diplomatic activism [was Re: Is Stallman nuts?] Aaron Wolf
2019-09-21 19:52               ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2019-09-18 23:44       ` Is Stallman nuts? Adrienne G. Thompson
2019-09-19  0:31         ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
     [not found] <mailman.1435.1568576087.2187.libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>
2019-09-16 22:12 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2019-09-16 22:20   ` Dr. Tom McKellips
     [not found] <mailman.1925.1568747595.2189.libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>
2019-09-17 20:05 ` Cinder Roxley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-18  2:49 Jeffrey Haines via libreplanet-discuss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0219be5bf933a4a7b4fd1dadfd25757a@basiscraft.com \
    --to=lord@basiscraft.com \
    --cc=adriennegayethompson@gmail.com \
    --cc=libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).