git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
To: lists@haller-berlin.de (Stefan Haller)
Cc: gitster@pobox.com (Junio C Hamano), peff@peff.net (Jeff King),
	marcnarc@xiplink.com (Marc Branchaud),
	mhagger@alum.mit.edu (Michael Haggerty),
	cmn@elego.de (Carlos Martín Nieto),
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Auto-matching upstream branches by name
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpq8vj3zgwz.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1kgwl7x.5pilu08h6t2eM%lists@haller-berlin.de> (Stefan Haller's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:01:49 +0100")

lists@haller-berlin.de (Stefan Haller) writes:

> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'm starting to wonder if the whole "upstream" thing should
>> not be deactivated by default, and replaced with a simpler mechanism
>> like "pull.default", similar to what "push.default" does today. Then,
>> users could set "pull.default=current", and "git pull" would pull a
>> branch with the same name remotely. Or users could set
>> "pull.default=upstream" and get what Git does today.
>
> Yes, this is pretty similar to what I had in mind, in the last paragraph
> of this message:
>
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/192547/focus=192694

Indeed, yes.

> But it's not just about pull versus push. If you make them both work
> with same-name branches automatically, you still need to make "status"
> and "branch -vv" aware of that too, so that they can report whether you
> are ahead or behind your, well, "upstream".  "git log @{u}" would be
> nice as well in this mode.
>
> So I think that "pull.default" is not the best option to use for this;
> maybe something like "branch.automatchupstreambyname" or some such.

I'd call that 'upstream.default' actually.

> (It's really a separate discussion from the push.default question
> though, so I'm changing the subject.)

Separate, but related. If Git had this behavior as default, I'd
recommend 'current' without hesitation. I'm starting to be convinced
that the whole 'upstream' stuff is confusing for non-expert, but it is
for pull as much as it is for push.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-14  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-08 10:01 git push default behaviour? Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 10:11 ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-08 10:13   ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 10:28     ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-03-08 10:38       ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 10:42         ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-03-08 10:43           ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 18:22             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-08 18:35               ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-08 19:03                 ` Andreas Krey
2012-03-08 19:29                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09  8:05                   ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09  9:50                     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 11:28                       ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-09 11:54                       ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 14:42                       ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-19  6:02             ` Miles Bader
2012-03-19 16:12               ` Philippe Vaucher
2012-03-08 15:00           ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-08 15:26             ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-08 17:49               ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-08 18:04                 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09  3:38                   ` Jeff King
2012-03-09  5:23                     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09  5:38                       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09  8:06                         ` demerphq
2012-03-09  8:48                           ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-09  9:50                             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16  9:38                             ` Gelonida N
2012-03-09  8:25                       ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09  8:31                         ` [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 10:01                           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 20:21                             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 10:25                           ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-03-09 18:30                             ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-09 21:08                               ` Stefan Haller
2012-03-10 21:05                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-11 20:26                                   ` Stefan Haller
2012-03-12  8:47                                     ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 11:22                                       ` Stefan Haller
2012-03-12 12:46                                         ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 16:11                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 15:10                                 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-10  6:16                               ` Michael Haggerty
2012-03-12 15:13                                 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-12 16:37                                   ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 17:53                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 18:37                                     ` Jeff King
2012-03-12 19:06                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 19:33                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 20:16                                         ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-13  9:40                                           ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13  9:36                                         ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 21:30                                         ` Jeff King
2012-03-13 22:54                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 13:50                                             ` Jeff King
2012-03-14 20:59                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13  9:34                                       ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 13:17                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13 13:35                                           ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 20:01                                             ` Auto-matching upstream branches by name (was: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default) Stefan Haller
2012-03-14  9:10                                               ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2012-03-13 14:31                                           ` [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default Marc Branchaud
2012-03-13 14:59                                           ` Holger Hellmuth
2012-03-13 17:41                                             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 19:15                                               ` Holger Hellmuth
2012-03-15  8:02                                                 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-15 10:43                                                   ` Holger Hellmuth
2012-03-13 15:02                                           ` Andreas Ericsson
2012-03-13 21:35                                           ` Jeff King
2012-03-13 18:08                                         ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14  4:46                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 12:47                                             ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 17:29                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 17:49                                                 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 20:44                                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14  9:07                                           ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 13:23                                             ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 14:47                                               ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 17:47                                                 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-15  8:05                                                   ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14  8:59                                       ` Michael Haggerty
2012-03-14 14:00                                         ` Jeff King
2012-03-09 11:26                           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-03-16  8:51                           ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-16  9:43                             ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-16 12:05                               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 12:42                                 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-16 21:48                                   ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-17 20:46                                     ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-19 16:11                           ` Andrew Myers
2012-03-09  9:57                         ` git push default behaviour? Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 12:11                           ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 16:22                             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 17:44                               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 14:56                           ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-09 16:23                             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13 15:18                               ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-12  9:34                           ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 16:29                             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13  9:47                               ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 12:34                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 19:35                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-17 15:49                           ` Eric Hanchrow
2012-03-08 17:37             ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-08 11:33         ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-08 11:34           ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-13 15:27             ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-14 12:12               ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-14 17:16                 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-08 11:54       ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-08 12:12         ` demerphq
2012-03-17  9:36 ` Sebastien Douche
2012-03-17  9:38   ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-17  9:51     ` Sebastien Douche
2012-03-18 10:26       ` Pavel Pospíšil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpq8vj3zgwz.fsf@bauges.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=cmn@elego.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=lists@haller-berlin.de \
    --cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).