From: lists@haller-berlin.de (Stefan Haller)
To: Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr (Matthieu Moy),
gitster@pobox.com (Junio C Hamano)
Cc: peff@peff.net (Jeff King), marcnarc@xiplink.com (Marc Branchaud),
mhagger@alum.mit.edu (Michael Haggerty),
cmn@elego.de (Carlos Martín Nieto),
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Auto-matching upstream branches by name (was: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:01:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1kgwl7x.5pilu08h6t2eM%lists@haller-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpqaa3kfwss.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
> Actually, I'm starting to wonder if the whole "upstream" thing should
> not be deactivated by default, and replaced with a simpler mechanism
> like "pull.default", similar to what "push.default" does today. Then,
> users could set "pull.default=current", and "git pull" would pull a
> branch with the same name remotely. Or users could set
> "pull.default=upstream" and get what Git does today.
Yes, this is pretty similar to what I had in mind, in the last paragraph
of this message:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/192547/focus=192694
But it's not just about pull versus push. If you make them both work
with same-name branches automatically, you still need to make "status"
and "branch -vv" aware of that too, so that they can report whether you
are ahead or behind your, well, "upstream". "git log @{u}" would be
nice as well in this mode.
So I think that "pull.default" is not the best option to use for this;
maybe something like "branch.automatchupstreambyname" or some such.
(It's really a separate discussion from the push.default question
though, so I'm changing the subject.)
--
Stefan Haller
Berlin, Germany
http://www.haller-berlin.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-08 10:01 git push default behaviour? Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 10:11 ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-08 10:13 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 10:28 ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-03-08 10:38 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 10:42 ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-03-08 10:43 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-08 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-08 18:35 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-08 19:03 ` Andreas Krey
2012-03-08 19:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 8:05 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 9:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 11:28 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-09 11:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 14:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-19 6:02 ` Miles Bader
2012-03-19 16:12 ` Philippe Vaucher
2012-03-08 15:00 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-08 15:26 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-08 17:49 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-08 18:04 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 3:38 ` Jeff King
2012-03-09 5:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 5:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 8:06 ` demerphq
2012-03-09 8:48 ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-09 9:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 9:38 ` Gelonida N
2012-03-09 8:25 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 10:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 10:25 ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-03-09 18:30 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-09 21:08 ` Stefan Haller
2012-03-10 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-11 20:26 ` Stefan Haller
2012-03-12 8:47 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 11:22 ` Stefan Haller
2012-03-12 12:46 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 16:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 15:10 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-10 6:16 ` Michael Haggerty
2012-03-12 15:13 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-12 16:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 17:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 18:37 ` Jeff King
2012-03-12 19:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 19:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 20:16 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-03-13 9:40 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 9:36 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 21:30 ` Jeff King
2012-03-13 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 13:50 ` Jeff King
2012-03-14 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13 9:34 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 13:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13 13:35 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 20:01 ` Stefan Haller [this message]
2012-03-14 9:10 ` Auto-matching upstream branches by name Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default Marc Branchaud
2012-03-13 14:59 ` Holger Hellmuth
2012-03-13 17:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 19:15 ` Holger Hellmuth
2012-03-15 8:02 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-15 10:43 ` Holger Hellmuth
2012-03-13 15:02 ` Andreas Ericsson
2012-03-13 21:35 ` Jeff King
2012-03-13 18:08 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 4:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 12:47 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 17:49 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 9:07 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 13:23 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-14 14:47 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 17:47 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-15 8:05 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 8:59 ` Michael Haggerty
2012-03-14 14:00 ` Jeff King
2012-03-09 11:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-03-16 8:51 ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-16 9:43 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-16 12:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 12:42 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-16 21:48 ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-17 20:46 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-19 16:11 ` Andrew Myers
2012-03-09 9:57 ` git push default behaviour? Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 12:11 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-09 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-09 14:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-09 16:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13 15:18 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-12 9:34 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-12 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13 9:47 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-13 12:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-17 15:49 ` Eric Hanchrow
2012-03-08 17:37 ` Dmitry Potapov
2012-03-08 11:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-08 11:34 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-13 15:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-14 12:12 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-14 17:16 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-08 11:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-08 12:12 ` demerphq
2012-03-17 9:36 ` Sebastien Douche
2012-03-17 9:38 ` Jeremy Morton
2012-03-17 9:51 ` Sebastien Douche
2012-03-18 10:26 ` Pavel Pospíšil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1kgwl7x.5pilu08h6t2eM%lists@haller-berlin.de \
--to=lists@haller-berlin.de \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=cmn@elego.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).