From: Aaron Wolf <wolftune@riseup.net>
To: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
Cc: Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz>,
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: Re: Should distros take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software?
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:52:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e4eb126-36ab-2f1c-2d66-2825f8249d50@riseup.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YizsQdy/VZcy0iFo@protected.localdomain>
The point of the podcast discussion was to grapple with the questions
about power. I'm not saying I agree with every point or the way they
frame the discussion. They are saying something to the effect of
"empowering all people in the world via decentralized software freedom
gives up the possibility of controlling bad actors", and the tension is
whether there's any viable stance for the idea of even truly democratic
organized power being okay having that sort of power over individual actors.
I think the podcast is worth a listen, and your reactivity about Ukraine
being described as "sovereign" is not relevant to the question.
That said, the 13,000+ who died in Eastern Ukraine over the past several
years are not all victims of the Ukrainian government directly, it
amounts to the deaths on both sides. You can argue that the Ukrainian
government could have made different decisions to avoid the situation,
but other will argue that the Russian support of separatists is also at
fault. Regardless of these dynamics, I get your point. Ukraine wasn't
merely a plain old peaceful place prior to the recent invasion. Still,
Russia chose to spread the war to a much greater scale and a much
greater geographic region, affecting vastly greater numbers of people.
"Sovereignty is lost at time point when there is abuse and neglect of
human rights."
Nonsense. Tell that to China. We can't honestly have a debate about
whether China is a sovereign nation. We could discuss whether sovereign
states of the modern sort should even exist at all. That could be more
interesting. We could assert a political claim about what types of state
sovereignty *ought* to exist or that we *recognize* (in the way that
people politically refuse to recognize basic facts because of political
tensions about the acknowledgement).
But this gets too tangential for this list about software freedom. The
philosophical and on-topic question is: are there ever situations where
the decentralized power of software freedom is too dangerous? And if so,
is it even possible to avoid it? And if so, who would justly be in
control of such technology restrictions.
It is a valid, and FSF-aligned position to say either that no situation
ever justifies having software available but keeping the code restricted
*or* to say that even if such situations exist, there is no (or even can
never be a) powerful entity which we can trust to be the one managing
the restrictions. But this is a discussion we could bother having.
There is no discussion to have about blocking Russian military from
using GNU/Linux distros. That's as out of scope as wishing for them not
to have access to nuclear technology. The inventors of nuclear
technology might feel guilty about their role in the threat of nuclear
war, but it's too late now to undo that. The question now that we can at
least have philosophically is to reflect on this in terms of considering
whether or not we see a place for limits to software freedom for
dangerous technology. And that discussion doesn't rely on any agreement
about which current actors are good or bad.
On 2022-03-12 10:53, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Aaron Wolf <wolftune@riseup.net> [2022-03-12 20:48]:
>> The recent podcast from Humane Tech folks grapples with the complexities of
>> this issue:
>
> From your link:
>
>> https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/49-the-dark-side-of-decentralization
>
> ,----
> | But if the world lives on Bitcoin, we may not be able to sanction
> | nation states like Russia when they invade sovereign nations.
> `----
>
> To be sovereign nation it does not mean killing withing one country
> one's own people and even 13000 of them. That is not
> "sovereign". Sovereignty is lost at time point when there is abuse and
> neglect of human rights. This war is not begin, but end of the war
> that begun 2014. Back then the conflict was financed by US government.
>
> Thus it should be clear there are multiple viewpoints on the issue.
>
> One could say that US has used free software in all of the killings
> like in Afghanistan or Libya, etc.
>
> Those discussions will never end. That is why we stick to freedom
> zero, use it as you wish.
>
> Using free software principles now for political propaganda is
> disgusting. I find it hostile to free software principles.
>
>
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-13 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-24 8:04 Should we take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software? Jacob Hrbek
2022-02-24 17:00 ` Devin Ulibarri
[not found] ` <Yhh7tevsz3Ha5xY+@protected.localdomain>
2022-02-25 12:15 ` Devin Ulibarri
2022-02-25 15:32 ` Aaron Wolf
2022-02-26 0:48 ` Thomas Lord
2022-02-26 1:34 ` Should we take steps to reduce Russian access to Free Software? No J.B. Nicholson
2022-02-27 4:10 ` Should we take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software? Richard Stallman
2022-03-01 4:59 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-01 7:52 ` Jean Louis
2022-02-27 4:11 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <35700904-028a-1dbf-3d48-0478701ae0f8@gmail.com>
2022-03-01 4:24 ` Richard Stallman
2022-03-01 10:50 ` Should we take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software?> the headache of it all dissolves in forgiveness gregor
2022-03-02 6:18 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-02 6:58 ` gregor
2022-03-03 5:07 ` Richard Stallman
2022-03-03 13:51 ` gregor
2022-03-03 15:56 ` Devin Ulibarri
2022-03-03 18:45 ` Ole Aamot
2022-03-04 15:13 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-04 15:42 ` Lori Nagel via libreplanet-discuss
[not found] ` <c54b6cbc-a88a-3abf-2f60-b0fb2ca0d066@rixotstudio.cz>
2022-03-06 5:13 ` Richard Stallman
2022-03-08 11:01 ` Jacob Hrbek
2022-03-08 22:50 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-09 16:20 ` Should distros take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software? Félicien Pillot
2022-03-09 16:43 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-09 18:03 ` Erica Frank
2022-03-10 16:01 ` Jacob Hrbek
2022-03-11 16:16 ` Matt Ivie
2022-03-12 5:27 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-12 17:48 ` Aaron Wolf
2022-03-12 18:53 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-13 3:52 ` Aaron Wolf [this message]
2022-03-13 9:51 ` Federico Leva (Nemo)
2022-03-13 15:07 ` Aaron Wolf
2022-03-13 17:33 ` gregor
2022-03-13 18:51 ` Miles Fidelman
2022-03-13 20:25 ` Aaron Wolf
2022-03-12 19:36 ` Miles Fidelman
2022-03-12 23:44 ` Getting the truth into Russia Akira Urushibata
2022-03-13 17:57 ` Should distros take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software? Jean Louis
2022-03-13 23:49 ` Ron Nazarov via libreplanet-discuss
2022-03-14 1:57 ` Akira Urushibata
2022-03-14 2:01 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-14 5:50 ` "Open Source" is vague term referring to guns, wine, spirituality, etc Jean Louis
2022-03-14 21:01 ` Aaron Wolf
2022-03-14 21:17 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-14 21:48 ` Aaron Wolf
2022-03-15 5:26 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-14 22:01 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-15 6:10 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-15 11:54 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-18 6:14 ` Valentino Giudice
2022-03-11 5:15 ` Should distros take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software? Richard Stallman
2022-03-11 14:36 ` knowledgeofnations
2022-03-11 15:03 ` Miles Fidelman
2022-03-11 18:22 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-12 16:55 ` Miles Fidelman
2022-03-08 23:22 ` Should we take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software?> the headache of it all dissolves in forgiveness Matt Ivie
2022-03-09 4:21 ` Richard Stallman
2022-03-30 22:44 ` Ole Aamot
[not found] ` <CAA+nH92ffd9PqZ0S=6tvJN4K+j64J4CU8AKwSPu=McWr=eZwww@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-31 6:32 ` Ole Aamot
2022-04-01 4:11 ` Richard Stallman
2022-03-09 8:05 ` Free software is not perpetrator Jean Louis
2022-03-09 15:21 ` Should we take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software?> the headache of it all dissolves in forgiveness Federico Leva (Nemo)
2022-03-02 11:12 ` Jean Louis
2022-03-03 5:07 ` Richard Stallman
2022-03-01 17:53 ` Should we take steps to reduce russian access to Free Software? Julian Daich
2022-02-24 17:10 ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2022-02-24 18:03 ` Aaron Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e4eb126-36ab-2f1c-2d66-2825f8249d50@riseup.net \
--to=wolftune@riseup.net \
--cc=bugs@gnu.support \
--cc=kreyren@rixotstudio.cz \
--cc=libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).