bug-gnulib@gnu.org mirror (unofficial)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
@ 2021-05-23  4:11 Maxim Cournoyer
  2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2021-05-23  4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bug-gnulib

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 873 bytes --]

Hello!

I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'.  It
seems to be finding problems, failing with:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[...]
GPL            ??             lib/xstrtoull.c
GPL            ??             lib/xstrtoumax.c
GPL            ??             lib/gl_xsublist.c
LGPLv2+        GPLv2+         lib/glthread/yield.h
make: *** [Makefile:142: sc_check_copyright] Error 1

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
command "make" "check" failed with status 2
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-gnulib-0.1-0.af26171.drv-1'
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I'm currently using the following dependencies: cppi@1.18 grep@3.4
perl@5.30.2 sed@4.8 texinfo@6.7.

Is this a known problem or is my environment missing something?

Attached is the full log, compressed with gzip.


[-- Attachment #2: test-suite.log.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 10669 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 677 bytes --]


Also, I had to run the test suite via a single process, as attempting to
run it in parallel would error with this message near the beginning:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[...]
+$(shell f=$(gnulib_dir)/lib/intprops.h;
+  perl -lne '$(gl_extract_define_simple)' $$f | sort -u | tr '\n' ' ')
+# Remove trailing space and convert to a regular expression:
make: *** [Makefile:134: sc_check_sym_list] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'syntax-check'.  Stop.
make: *** [Makefile:67: sc_maint] Error 2
[...]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Thank you,

Maxim

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-23  4:11 test suite failure caused by check-copyright script Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
  2021-05-24  1:51   ` Paul Eggert
                     ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Haible @ 2021-05-23 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bug-gnulib; +Cc: Maxim Cournoyer

Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'.  It
> seems to be finding problems, failing with:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> [...]
> GPL            ??             lib/xstrtoull.c
> GPL            ??             lib/xstrtoumax.c
> GPL            ??             lib/gl_xsublist.c
> LGPLv2+        GPLv2+         lib/glthread/yield.h
> make: *** [Makefile:142: sc_check_copyright] Error 1

It seems we made a decision in November 2011, regarding license
statements in source code files, [1], but did not follow through
with the implementation of this decision: 'check-copyright' reports
more than 2300 failures.

Does everyone still agree
  - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
    with the module description, and
  - to remove the statement from the documentation
    "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
     specification is in the module description file." ?

Bruno

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-11/msg00191.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
@ 2021-05-24  1:51   ` Paul Eggert
  2021-05-26 17:30   ` Eric Blake
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggert @ 2021-05-24  1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruno Haible, bug-gnulib; +Cc: Maxim Cournoyer

On 5/23/21 4:19 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Does everyone still agree
>    - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
>      with the module description, and
>    - to remove the statement from the documentation
>      "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
>       specification is in the module description file." ?

Yes, that still sounds reasonable.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
  2021-05-24  1:51   ` Paul Eggert
@ 2021-05-26 17:30   ` Eric Blake
  2021-05-27 14:44   ` Jim Meyering
  2021-05-27 15:14   ` Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2021-05-26 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruno Haible; +Cc: bug-gnulib, Maxim Cournoyer

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Does everyone still agree
>   - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
>     with the module description, and
>   - to remove the statement from the documentation
>     "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
>      specification is in the module description file." ?

Yes, that's fine with me.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
  2021-05-24  1:51   ` Paul Eggert
  2021-05-26 17:30   ` Eric Blake
@ 2021-05-27 14:44   ` Jim Meyering
  2021-05-27 15:14   ` Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jim Meyering @ 2021-05-27 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruno Haible; +Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org List, Maxim Cournoyer

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 400 bytes --]

On Sun, May 23, 2021, 8:05 AM Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:

> Does everyone still agree
>   - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
>     with the module description, and
>   - to remove the statement from the documentation
>     "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
>      specification is in the module description file." ?
>

Definitely.

>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 920 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
                     ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-27 14:44   ` Jim Meyering
@ 2021-05-27 15:14   ` Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list
  2021-05-27 17:54     ` Bruno Haible
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list @ 2021-05-27 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruno Haible; +Cc: bug-gnulib, Maxim Cournoyer

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]

Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'.  It
>> seems to be finding problems, failing with:
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> [...]
>> GPL            ??             lib/xstrtoull.c
>> GPL            ??             lib/xstrtoumax.c
>> GPL            ??             lib/gl_xsublist.c
>> LGPLv2+        GPLv2+         lib/glthread/yield.h
>> make: *** [Makefile:142: sc_check_copyright] Error 1
>
> It seems we made a decision in November 2011, regarding license
> statements in source code files, [1], but did not follow through
> with the implementation of this decision: 'check-copyright' reports
> more than 2300 failures.
>
> Does everyone still agree
>   - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
>     with the module description, and
>   - to remove the statement from the documentation
>     "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
>      specification is in the module description file." ?

Sounds good!

/Simon

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-27 15:14   ` Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list
@ 2021-05-27 17:54     ` Bruno Haible
  2021-05-27 18:14       ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Haible @ 2021-05-27 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Josefsson; +Cc: bug-gnulib, Maxim Cournoyer

> Sounds good!
> 
> /Simon

Thanks for all your voices.

I plan to start implementing this decision this week-end.

Bruno



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script
  2021-05-27 17:54     ` Bruno Haible
@ 2021-05-27 18:14       ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2021-05-27 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruno Haible; +Cc: Simon Josefsson, bug-gnulib

Hi Bruno,

Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> writes:

>> Sounds good!
>> 
>> /Simon
>
> Thanks for all your voices.
>
> I plan to start implementing this decision this week-end.

Yay!  I'll be happy to test it again after then, and report any
remaining problem there may be with running the test suite, so feel free
to ping.

Maxim


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-27 18:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-23  4:11 test suite failure caused by check-copyright script Maxim Cournoyer
2021-05-23 11:19 ` Bruno Haible
2021-05-24  1:51   ` Paul Eggert
2021-05-26 17:30   ` Eric Blake
2021-05-27 14:44   ` Jim Meyering
2021-05-27 15:14   ` Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list
2021-05-27 17:54     ` Bruno Haible
2021-05-27 18:14       ` Maxim Cournoyer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).