From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D013A1F5AE for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 17:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52882 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llxST-0003R5-TZ for normalperson@yhbt.net; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:36:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llxNK-0007gy-8Q for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:31:26 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:36382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llxN8-0000kn-8n for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:31:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622050267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o7uGOHvJf9lnN3hBnTH3mcdJ51BcqApiXwuDi7lhz+4=; b=dSb42Eu8gHmSThAVkbGKExlsOmxlYcFrK+FgwZQI/IcXBqiShGNOm1ch52n3Yc1dQCbM/I I/MQ27LHdOPkHxcVLpKeQzx1l0KDx2Qlv4Yd3mYJpD+eVZEakXnJ84wH7e7D4uGX9NB8Xp iVBQjE/wCUrK6RYyd05b5ClEiYpGWnM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-157-XyTae4MMNFCUzb-QNjr66Q-1; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:31:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XyTae4MMNFCUzb-QNjr66Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6322107ACCD; Wed, 26 May 2021 17:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-112-191.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.191]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437C85D9C6; Wed, 26 May 2021 17:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 12:30:56 -0500 From: Eric Blake To: Bruno Haible Subject: Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script Message-ID: <20210526173056.xh534pqyurijfhje@redhat.com> References: <871r9yw0m8.fsf@gmail.com> <8449867.oamTS1uBFA@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8449867.oamTS1uBFA@omega> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20210205 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=eblake@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.371, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Does everyone still agree > - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent > with the module description, and > - to remove the statement from the documentation > "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license > specification is in the module description file." ? Yes, that's fine with me. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org