From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D8F1F5AE for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 15:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkpf5-0004CR-3L for normalperson@yhbt.net; Sun, 23 May 2021 11:05:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkper-0004Bk-N2 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 11:04:49 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.25]:30327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkpep-0002zx-FH for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 11:04:49 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621782282; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=hqA7JahOq6bycHi3jilGA46IIcBIijxu/d9j+5032paIIeippNVANFw5YwbGyyq7pw IGQkF9MHoUMKjabb+LyTvJww5NDF4FEqYq6HXIX99xvkJkZTkF2a7a+JPcMmRKKGpdrs TfEkXILn+zFQ42c73kIkMsam7ORoJK8dR+JwLQAMmEd7T/4y1Kct+liyntV8a5d8f641 5KieVDHbYrY8BlRBw+oeghL/kWT+xSEWgV03vX8mEeQLLVc/mdPkpYbeWBLnAlmaLYtU rLS/3jKE/BR1bIxcAe6DBM/UfqBbYE4E59l0Ow4UH8x1bMMssgGgItTiWHlGQEMTTf8s z4AA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1621782282; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=Tcd2Gk7miPDjk7KWKreyomMxtg/j+dc5Z0iOsQ5EhzA=; b=iTvdC2q3hw3/vmwW/yvvGljjQbB1pE1W6svvM+w9pFYmO+dP7p9V4jR6PPjkS7czb/ KqW3Qv97lxhDze+E9FHIqppwCwGQ1ckSpqOzlziNbbUuVjrY5cDOEMqOq58Zn6rztFPn EfEVlOXWfSmBJ0EgybmJMf4dR1fKn82i17/sgL0glIVxnGgqCVCwIeA9NQauprqwCmR9 F/ASu7vy8FdWc4ySkK6vdO7qzsOvTkWNWwbGXrbfQEv31O6B7CeUlH9ZO4/IJUPlcGtU pc0C+tX0nSvSGT9SPtgkwcHglRWKChdgIFH7cw8KepBBJHhYdc7mUeeL6dM1W2H8LZvU Mw9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; dkim=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1621782282; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=Tcd2Gk7miPDjk7KWKreyomMxtg/j+dc5Z0iOsQ5EhzA=; b=HotP5PksjRgYw6mGcqI7h6tez/ugnetbRRd8/lqCGQ4kGaERm10T3tD2dezvJgZiOc 6+em+W+/OnTxgV+b/+1ZJCJ0dsQ2I/yX0JlE0AyUH9MMma4Bq77XmX5tfLuJFth5sgas 87dBGvV39voDjDIQI3QmRvgfLDyVk9RGmnIPRrnnPIU17Waa67vHhs0ajSCwdJWOFLZ+ PoVzpHEGaOYXbJxa8GekA0lpRSlQ/jvon6OwaG3FZ+HjUiSlLPFJWdLwRvXNO/xf51qK HgAmRRixq1i3jKBaRXjn7fFB/e9TmoWUSJniAMSaq6PznC4hLTQBIAmWQR1A6oj7DoY/ y6xw== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOHqf3z5NW" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.26.1 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Z0bd4cx4NF4g5vm (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 23 May 2021 17:04:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Subject: Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 13:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: <8449867.oamTS1uBFA@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-210-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <871r9yw0m8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871r9yw0m8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.215.255.25; envelope-from=bruno@clisp.org; helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'. It > seems to be finding problems, failing with: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > [...] > GPL ?? lib/xstrtoull.c > GPL ?? lib/xstrtoumax.c > GPL ?? lib/gl_xsublist.c > LGPLv2+ GPLv2+ lib/glthread/yield.h > make: *** [Makefile:142: sc_check_copyright] Error 1 It seems we made a decision in November 2011, regarding license statements in source code files, [1], but did not follow through with the implementation of this decision: 'check-copyright' reports more than 2300 failures. Does everyone still agree - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent with the module description, and - to remove the statement from the documentation "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license specification is in the module description file." ? Bruno [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-11/msg00191.html