From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B5E1F5AE for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 14:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmHG9-0005V4-LG for normalperson@yhbt.net; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:45:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmHFH-0003He-7S for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:44:23 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com ([209.85.219.181]:45055) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmHFE-0007sC-Ec for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:44:22 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id p184so975126yba.11 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 07:44:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ajckB+KedqyvPgb1TMF/YJB3hvxJnvWuQmefZtQwcp4=; b=PPURmWFaxo4dzaXYfd5Fre4CYw68JoqQbISlQvO1NSIO3r5g39jkHACYEC6HZvBgF0 CCusndxedQQJJh17XuMgUwnl74QR8ET+TtJNOEFZI8NCy/1y1NGxRJKQkAM9YDsE11HU dxwVu45ysNToPtS60DxjjXLNAed/AKqCx4oaevd0jIeRUdDn5ZCpVM3aAEA9TdeMXiD/ x+4VjB4dMj7y6fVZqLC2c9w352elQj+uzfzT0y60dmPUqiCOWM9wCik/kWFFASS7Y4aJ 1spYyVCfbmPjHSa0nm/WemcTvXTGqNhUFXRgtLidfdGBDvBrMHWrEEbbey4gcMxenoAV Ybxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338d27DZiQSfyZjDQCzL36BLh8Q40moPmstCTo5Cw5KGeVQ0+iM PxG15p7g0I/Dd+SQ6m0zVO7bCQIBVDz/M1iiWmc3Ods5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywqNMCXMiUc5DbQ5bzSmZJ3D8zxQfGWgKzlHJGbyCBNjin3HnSY66zjtGb9wdOn/wZcJInwRJKQur6OUZkkS8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:888b:: with SMTP id d11mr5607227ybl.385.1622126657832; Thu, 27 May 2021 07:44:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <871r9yw0m8.fsf@gmail.com> <8449867.oamTS1uBFA@omega> In-Reply-To: <8449867.oamTS1uBFA@omega> From: Jim Meyering Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 07:44:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script To: Bruno Haible Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000038897105c350cbe5" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.181; envelope-from=meyering@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-f181.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_05=-0.5, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "bug-gnulib@gnu.org List" , Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" --00000000000038897105c350cbe5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, May 23, 2021, 8:05 AM Bruno Haible wrote: > Does everyone still agree > - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent > with the module description, and > - to remove the statement from the documentation > "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license > specification is in the module description file." ? > Definitely. > --00000000000038897105c350cbe5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, May 23, 2021, 8:05 AM Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:
Does everyone still agree
=C2=A0 - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent =C2=A0 =C2=A0 with the module description, and
=C2=A0 - to remove the statement from the documentation
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 "The source files always say "GPL", but the re= al license
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0specification is in the module description file." = ?

Definitely.
--00000000000038897105c350cbe5--