Truth Social as an example of the limits of free software

From: Akira Urushibata <afu@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: <libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>
Subject: Truth Social as an example of the limits of free software
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2023 07:23:20 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023.09.05.07.23.20.365212339@afu.wta.att.ne.jp> (raw)

Last month I posted a message here on the problems of non-free
software in voting machines.  I was pointed out that free software
does not completely solve the problems; even with free software there
are numerous opportunities for bad actors to upset the process.

I understand the limits of free software.  One problem I identify is
that some people use free software not because they value freedom, but
simply because it is economical to do so.  The great charm of free
software is absence of charge.  Often there are additional merits:
quality is high, problems are few, documentation is reliable and there
exists a community of engineers who understand the code.  People who
exploit the "cheapness" do nothing to promote free software and its
philosophy; they do not say: "This product is possible thanks to the
free software packages X, Y, Z and many more.  We are grateful to all
the develpers who worked on them while making this available to the
public on gracious terms."

The Truth Social social media service is an example of a product
developed, owned and used by people who care little of the liberty
which free software makes possible.  Truth Social uses Mastadon as its
back-end and Soapbox as its front-end.  They released their derived
work for public testing without making available the source code in
violation of the license.  (Mastodon and Soapbox are AGPL.)  They
eventually released the source code in .zip format.

When Truth Social was launched, it proclaimed to be a "big tent"
platform allowing for "free expression" without "discriminating on the
basis of political ideology".  The name "Truth Social" suggests that
they care about truth and society.  In reality Truth Social is a chamber
where extreme opinions far from the truth circulate.  It is for people
who like to say and hear such things.  We know that incorrect
information is bad for freedom.  However, Truth Social members value
the freedom to pursue their personal pleasure and comfort above all
else.  For them what makes them feel good is "truth" and such good
feeling is the foundation of "social" interaction.

A critical problem Truth Social faces is that the extreme opinions
make many people uncomfortable.  They will never consider signing up
to participate in the dialogue.  Advertisers feel the same way.  As a
result the platform is financialy insecure.  It is estimated that it
loses 1.7 million dollar each month.  It started out with 37 million
dollars in late 2021 - early 2022.  Without additional funds, it won't
be able to continue for long.  Elon Musk's X (foremerly Twitter) faces
a similar fate.  A little inspection reveals that under Musk's rule it
has followed a course similar to that of Truth Social.

I have taken a look into Truth Social here but my main objective is to
bring attention to the limits of free software.  It appears to me that
freedom is good, but it can be combined with bad things.  Literacy
greatly enhances one's freedom but one can argue that efforts to
eradicate illitearcy violate the illiterate man's freedom to remain
so.  In the above I have shown that free software can be used in a
product which spreads falsehood, encourages ignorance and
irrationality and endorses greed, selfishness and lack of gratitude.
This makes me feel that we have much more to do than just call for
freedom in software.

In classical Chinese philosophy, Lao Zi stresses freedom.  Confucius
preaches sound education, consideration toward others, gratitude and
rituals.  Lao Zi advocates small communities of people living simple
lives.  Confucius and his followers refined a body of thought which
would later support imperial dynasties.  Unfortunately it became
excessively sophisticated.  Combined with a writing system which
employs more than a thousand characters this led to a stark class
distinction between the literate and the illiterate.

---

Truth Social - Wikipedia
(See "Software")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_Social

Trump's Social Media Platform and the Affero General Public License
(of Mastodon) - Conservancy Blog - Software Freedom Conservancy
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2021/oct/21/trump-group-agplv3/

The Trump Truth Social network removes the most freedom-friendly
features of the Fediverse
https://pocketnow.com/trump-truth-social-network-removes-most-freedom-friendly-features-fediverse/

On Trump's Truth Social: Ads for Miracle Cures, Scams and Fake
Merchandise
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/27/technology/trump-truth-social-ads.html

Trump Media's proposed merger partner Digital World faces crucial vote
The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/02/truth-social-trump-media-digital-world/

How to Lose Money: Buy Digital World Acquisition Corp.
Morningstar
https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/how-lose-money-buy-digital-world-acquisition-corp

_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss