From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Setup non-pushing gerrit instance for glibc.
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:17:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028191749.GA12487@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910281739380.20661@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Hi,
Joseph Myers wrote:
> We have that problem in glibc, but we also have the problem of how to make
> review as efficient for the reviewer as possible - enabling reviewing 100
> patches a day, as Carlos said at the glibc BoF.
>
> If reviewing a patch, or understanding the context for comments, requires
> opening a browser tab and cutting and pasting a URL in there and clicking
> around to find things on that page, that *reduces* my efficiency
[...]
> But there are 90% of common cases that it should be possible to handle
> properly by email if a few issues are fixed:
Thanks for writing this up. I agree with this goal.
For that 10% that you can't handle by email, let me also recommend
https://opendev.org/ttygroup/gertty.
> * Properly support emails with inline replies and the metadata at the
> bottom of the email not quoted (only the relevant content replied to being
> quoted). This means (a) attaching them to the right issue, based on
> message-ids found in email headers and
This is https://crbug.com/gerrit/8904.
> (b) not losing the quoted text
> being replied to which is important to understanding the replies.
Can you say more about this (e.g. do you have an example)?
> * Handle email replies to notifications of new patches, not just to
> comments on them.
I would expect this to already work as well.
> * Include diff hunks in emails with comments on changed code (we now have
> more context in the code quoted, which is an improvement, but seeing the
> actual *changes* being commented on, rather than just one version of the
> code, is important to provide sufficient information in many cases).
This is related to https://crbug.com/gerrit/11804, but it's not quite
the same. It sounds like you'd like the snippets to be in unified
diff format (which makes sense to me).
> Most of the time, an initial response to a bug report in Bugzilla does not
> require opening a browser
[etc]
Thanks for this context as well. It makes the workflow a bit more
concrete.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 19:39 Setup non-pushing gerrit instance for glibc Carlos O'Donell
2019-10-24 21:41 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-25 0:43 ` Ian Kent
2019-10-25 1:16 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-10-25 10:21 ` Ian Kent
2019-10-25 1:02 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-10-25 2:04 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-25 3:14 ` Simon Marchi
2019-10-25 4:10 ` Simon Marchi
2019-10-25 14:48 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-25 15:48 ` Simon Marchi
2019-10-25 16:10 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-25 16:28 ` Simon Marchi
2019-10-25 1:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-10-25 14:09 ` Florian Weimer
2019-10-25 15:18 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-25 17:00 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-25 20:33 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-25 21:06 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-25 21:13 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-27 22:12 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-28 17:58 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-28 19:17 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2019-10-28 22:59 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-29 1:21 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-25 22:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-10-26 13:53 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-10-30 18:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-11-12 18:53 ` Gabriel F. T. Gomes
2019-11-12 19:21 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-11-12 19:59 ` Florian Weimer
2019-11-12 20:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-11-12 21:10 ` Gabriel F. T. Gomes
2019-11-12 21:13 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191028191749.GA12487@google.com \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).