Re: federated free software movement

[jahoti via libreplanet-discuss <libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]

On 11/16/21 7:45 PM, Dennis Payne wrote:
> I don't see how a federated wikipedia would work. Even if you banned
> obvious trolls, how would you deal with contentious issues? Federation
> isn't some magical technologies that immediately makes everything
> better.

For the case of contentious issues, Stallman did make an interesting 
suggestion in his essay proposing a free encyclopaedia that multiple 
versions of an article could be offered. I don't know how that would be 
technically implemented, yet it might be a viable option.

> An emphasis on self-hosting is not a good idea in my opinion. It is
> great that we are not locked into a commercial provider but most people
> don't want to self-host. Self-hosting is work. Some people will
> certainly do that but thankfully some of them allow the rest of us to
> use their service. While I can run my own mastadon, I don't want to.
> 
> (That being said, it should be easy to setup a self-host. I was on a
> Hubzilla instance but it broke and the admin could not figure out how
> to fix it. For Hubzilla they provide support using Hubzilla. So if you
> have a problem on your instance, you need to register on another
> instance so you can ask for help.)

Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote an interesting article on this: 
https://rosenzweig.io/blog/the-federation-fallacy.html


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss