LibrePlanet discussion list archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arthur Torrey <arthur_torrey@comcast.net>
To: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
Cc: Yuchen Pei <hi@ypei.me>,
	vidak@riseup.net, libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: Re: federated free software movement
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 22:22:31 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <184722887.1166519.1638156151381@connect.xfinity.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaHP9IRMLCA/y06y@protected.localdomain>

We seem to keep going round and round on this one...

The original post on the topic was about a possible 'federated Free software movement' to include (among others) Free Software advocates, the right to repair folks and the open hardware community.  Each of these groups has their own lists, websites, and other methods of communicating within their own circles, and sets their own expectations of what is and isn't OK within them....

I would expect any federated activity to be in SEPARATE lists, websites, etc. that are NOT part of the 'internal circles' of any of the groups, but are rather an intersection of them.

What I am trying to say is that in those separate "federation" cooperative groups there needs to be a focus on the shared objective and willingness to accept that participants from other circles may not have all the same feelings about issues that are only tangentially related...

Think of it as something like the various ecumenical religious associations that are intended to allow persons of differing faiths to work together towards common goals without fighting about details of doctrine...

I never intended that we should promote non-free software / hardware on this Libre-planet list, only that we should be tolerant about it on whatever federation structures evolve.

In terms of the power chair, the hardware outside of the electronics is pretty universal, in fact there are only a few companies that make much of it.  The actual chair 'manufacturers' only really make the frames and a few other bits that they then attach outsourced parts to....  So basically you end up with two motors (almost always brushed DC gearmotors) for the main drive system, and optionally, one or more linear actuators for various seating functions.  The electronics typically consist of a pair of high current PWM  motor controllers that handle the tank-steer mixing of the drive motors, one or tw input module(s), usually just one, and a module to control any lights, actuators and other auxiliary functions.  There may also be extra added functions for things like Bluetooth input to a computer / phone, environmental controls and so on, mostly only seen on very complex chairs for those with extreme disabilities.

All the modules on a given chair must come from the same manufacturer and model family.  They will be linked together using proprietary cables, and communicate using proprietary protocols, so it is not possible to just reverse engineer one of them, you have to do the entire system.  There is also a lot of fail-safe / safe-fail engineering required to ensure that everything works properly.  

It is a seriously gnarly problem

ART

------------------
Arthur Torrey - <arthur_torrey@comcast.net>
-------------------

> On 11/27/2021 1:28 AM Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote:
> 
>  
> * Arthur Torrey <arthur_torrey@comcast.net> [2021-11-17 04:12]:
> > 3. Reality check - You have a repair shop - customers come to you
> > with hardware that needs fixing and needs proprietary tools to do
> > so.  Which benefits your business more - gritting your teeth and
> > using the tools, or telling the customers they made a bad choice in
> > hardware and sending them away???
> 
> That is matter of ethical attitude or viewpoint that hardware shop
> owners have.
> 
> You do not appear to have the same ethical viewpoint as me. So people
> are different, but please do not push on this mailing list how people
> shall be opportunistic for money and succumb to proprietary
> software. It is really wrong list for such propaganda.
> 
> There are companies that have ethical viewpoints and sell such
> hardware that does not require proprietary software.
> 
> LibrePlanet is all about free software.
> 
> > 4. Personal reality - I mentioned earlier that I need a proprietary
> > closed software program that only runs on a proprietary OS in order
> > to adjust the programming on my power chair...  I got a comment back
> > that I should figure out how to do it w/ Free Software.... 
> 
> LibrePlanet is all about free software. That you have hardware and
> software that does not give you freedom is already clear.
> 
> How about presenting the power chair and how it looks like, that
> people can see how it can be replaced or made with free software?
> Start a project, ask for help, let us understand what exactly is the
> hardware that you wish to run, so maybe interested parties find way to
> provide similar hardware and software without proprietary chains.
> 
> > So let me see, I have a proprietary undocumented piece of hardware
> > that I need to totally reverse engineer from the hardware
> > communications protocol to it's internal data structures, along w/
> > how to read and write to it (as a non-programmer) OR use an existing
> > set of non-free tools that already does what I need?  (and there is
> > *NO* commercially available Free Software compatible wheelchair
> > control hardware, I'm using what is arguably the most open of the
> > available systems) Tough decision....(NOT!)  If I wasn't already a
> > Free Software supporter, where do you think I might have told the
> > person telling me to figure out how to use free software to stick
> > his GNU?
> 
> 😀 How about you show first that wheelchair on picture and video, that
> we understand features and functions of it.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean
> 
> Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
> https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
> 
> In support of Richard M. Stallman
> https://stallmansupport.org/

_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-14  2:03 federated free software movement Arthur Torrey
2021-11-14  4:18 ` vidak
2021-11-14 19:16   ` Arthur Torrey
2021-11-14 20:26     ` Jean Louis
2021-11-14 20:31     ` Jean Louis
2021-11-16  7:24       ` Yuchen Pei
2021-11-17  1:10         ` Arthur Torrey
2021-11-21  1:34           ` jahoti via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-27  6:28           ` Jean Louis
2021-11-29  3:22             ` Arthur Torrey [this message]
2021-11-29 22:00               ` Yuchen Pei
2021-11-29 23:46                 ` Arthur Torrey
2021-11-30  8:04                 ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-30 10:26                   ` Jean Louis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-13 14:29 Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-13 14:29 Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-13 16:30 ` Robert Read
2021-11-13 22:22 ` Jean Louis
2021-11-14  0:41 ` Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-14  0:51 ` Lohan G
2021-11-14 17:04 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-14 19:40   ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-14 20:04 ` Miles Fidelman
2021-11-14 20:27 ` Thomas Lord
2021-11-15  8:33   ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-16  7:32 ` Yuchen Pei
2021-11-16 12:49 ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-16 18:21 ` Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-16 19:45   ` Dennis Payne
2021-11-21  1:45     ` jahoti via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-22 21:49       ` Yuchen Pei
2021-11-23 18:02         ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-23 21:05           ` Dennis Payne
2021-11-23 21:24             ` Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
2021-11-17  0:51   ` Lohan G

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=184722887.1166519.1638156151381@connect.xfinity.com \
    --to=arthur_torrey@comcast.net \
    --cc=bugs@gnu.support \
    --cc=hi@ypei.me \
    --cc=libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org \
    --cc=vidak@riseup.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).