* People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? @ 2022-05-17 15:52 andrew via libreplanet-discuss 2022-05-17 16:20 ` wolftune 2022-05-17 21:27 ` Dennis Payne 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: andrew via libreplanet-discuss @ 2022-05-17 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: libreplanet-discuss [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2060 bytes --] Andrew Would https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller ones ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal advice Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but isn't asking for legal advice imo ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the license correctly” Andrew i guess Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free than MIT/BSD nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon Nguyen’s work Andrew yes ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an exception Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your thoughts Andrew meanwhile, https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses explains part of it Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive licenses, but not for the project working on now ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? Andrew I'm working on that ChrisWarrick okay I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain the GPL to them? [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --] _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? 2022-05-17 15:52 People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? andrew via libreplanet-discuss @ 2022-05-17 16:20 ` wolftune 2022-05-17 21:27 ` Dennis Payne 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: wolftune @ 2022-05-17 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: libreplanet-discuss This is the hypocritical version of the two anti-copyleft positions. The non-hypocritical is the one that opposes proprietary software but also dislikes copyleft limitations. Such as the copyfree.org angle. That's a principled but somewhat extreme position like anarchy, opposing all government regulations of creativity. This Chris person is making a stupid argument. He's saying that it's perfectly fine to block anyone from doing anything with some software by using a proprietary license but it's somehow evil to permit software freedoms via GPL. Graciously pointing out the hypocrisy is a good step. Just say, "if you think it's okay for me to use a *proprietary* license, what's wrong with using copyleft to *allow* people *more* freedom than the proprietary licenses?" Chris is asking to have it both ways. He's asking to assert that expat license is more free and freedom is good *and* that proprietary terms are fine. If he cares about freedom, he shouldn't be okay with proprietary terms. If he's okay with proprietary terms than he isn't focused on freedom and shouldn't mind GPL whether or not it's free in his view. Focus on that issue and skip the debate about which of expat or GPL is more free. On 2022-05-17 8:52 a.m., andrew via libreplanet-discuss <libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> wrote: > Andrew Would https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? > Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it > ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer > ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) > Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice > Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller ones > ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal advice > Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but isn't asking for legal advice imo > ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the license correctly” > Andrew i guess > Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? > ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free than MIT/BSD > nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate > Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks > Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it > ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon Nguyen’s work > Andrew yes > ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours > Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an exception > Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether > ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? > Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your thoughts > Andrew meanwhile, https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses explains part of it > Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive licenses, but not for the project working on now > ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? > Andrew I'm working on that > ChrisWarrick okay > > I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain > the GPL to them? > > > _______________________________________________ > libreplanet-discuss mailing list > libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss > _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? 2022-05-17 15:52 People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? andrew via libreplanet-discuss 2022-05-17 16:20 ` wolftune @ 2022-05-17 21:27 ` Dennis Payne 2022-05-18 2:15 ` Aaron Wolf 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dennis Payne @ 2022-05-17 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andrew, libreplanet-discuss Having one person consider GPL an evil license isn't a big deal. I wouldn't waste a lot of time trying to convert him. Nor would I send them a link to long essay explaining the situation. wolftune's argument is the simplest. However since you already sent him an offensive article, I doubt any argument will have much effect at this point. On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:52 +0800, andrew via libreplanet-discuss wrote: > Andrew Would https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to > indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project > based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? > Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it > ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer > ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) > Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice > Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for > bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller > ones > ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal > advice > Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but > isn't asking for legal advice imo > ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the > license correctly” > Andrew i guess > Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? > ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free > than MIT/BSD > nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate > Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks > Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it > ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon > Nguyen’s work > Andrew yes > ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours > Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an > exception > Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and > proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether > ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? > Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your > thoughts > Andrew meanwhile, > https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses > explains part of it > Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive > licenses, but not for the project working on now > ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? > Andrew I'm working on that > ChrisWarrick okay > > I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain > the GPL to them? > _______________________________________________ > libreplanet-discuss mailing list > libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? 2022-05-17 21:27 ` Dennis Payne @ 2022-05-18 2:15 ` Aaron Wolf 2022-05-18 16:26 ` Jim Garrett 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Aaron Wolf @ 2022-05-18 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: libreplanet-discuss, Dennis Payne, andrew [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3481 bytes --] FWIW, as a link anyone can use, I put together this some years ago, aiming to be fair and neutral enough while advocating copyleft: https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses That's probably the ideal link to share in this case IMHO On May 17, 2022 2:27:30 PM PDT, Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com> wrote: >Having one person consider GPL an evil license isn't a big deal. I >wouldn't waste a lot of time trying to convert him. Nor would I send >them a link to long essay explaining the situation. wolftune's argument >is the simplest. However since you already sent him an offensive >article, I doubt any argument will have much effect at this point. > >On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:52 +0800, andrew via libreplanet-discuss >wrote: >> Andrew Would https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to >> indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project >> based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? >> Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it >> ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer >> ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) >> Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice >> Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for >> bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller >> ones >> ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal >> advice >> Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but >> isn't asking for legal advice imo >> ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the >> license correctly” >> Andrew i guess >> Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? >> ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free >> than MIT/BSD >> nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate >> Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks >> Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it >> ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon >> Nguyen’s work >> Andrew yes >> ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours >> Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an >> exception >> Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and >> proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether >> ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? >> Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your >> thoughts >> Andrew meanwhile, >> https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses >> explains part of it >> Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive >> licenses, but not for the project working on now >> ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? >> Andrew I'm working on that >> ChrisWarrick okay >> >> I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain >> the GPL to them? >> _______________________________________________ >> libreplanet-discuss mailing list >> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org >> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss > > >_______________________________________________ >libreplanet-discuss mailing list >libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org >https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/plain, Size: 3767 bytes --] FWIW, as a link anyone can use, I put together this some years ago, aiming to be fair and neutral enough while advocating copyleft: [1]https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses That's probably the ideal link to share in this case IMHO On May 17, 2022 2:27:30 PM PDT, Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com> wrote: Having one person consider GPL an evil license isn't a big deal. I wouldn't waste a lot of time trying to convert him. Nor would I send them a link to long essay explaining the situation. wolftune's argument is the simplest. However since you already sent him an offensive article, I doubt any argument will have much effect at this point. On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:52 +0800, andrew via libreplanet-discuss wrote: Andrew Would [2]https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller ones ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal advice Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but isn't asking for legal advice imo ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the license correctly” Andrew i guess Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free than MIT/BSD nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon Nguyen’s work Andrew yes ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an exception Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your thoughts Andrew meanwhile, [3]https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-lic enses explains part of it Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive licenses, but not for the project working on now ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? Andrew I'm working on that ChrisWarrick okay I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain the GPL to them? _______________________________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org [4]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus s _______________________________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org [5]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus s References 1. https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses 2. https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ 3. https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses 4. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss 5. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --] _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? 2022-05-18 2:15 ` Aaron Wolf @ 2022-05-18 16:26 ` Jim Garrett 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jim Garrett @ 2022-05-18 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: libreplanet-discuss, Aaron Wolf, Dennis Payne, andrew [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5025 bytes --] Just a thought about rhetorical approach and wording: the phrase "proprietary fork" could be useful. Also, center the viewpoint of prospective contributors. "A permissive license allows software companies or other entities to make a proprietary fork of a project. This means someone (Developer A) could generously contribute code, then Microsoft (say) could take the project, add their own enhancements, and release a competing version. Developer A contributed expecting she would benefit from others' contributions, yet she is walled off from Microsoft's contributions. She's being played, basically. We want to choose a license that encourages participation, and we think guaranteeing access to future contributions without the possibility of a proprietary fork best serves that. "It's obvious why proprietary software companies prefer that projects use permissive licenses, but when picking a license, I'm not particularly concerned with what Google, Microsoft, or Apple prefer, or what best integrates with their software stack." I add this second bit because I think there's "word on the street" that permissive licenses are more popular and preferred by more, um, entities. But this is like gossip ("people are saying... "). Trace this to origin and I think we would find a few big players loudly and consistently slandering strong licenses. Jim Garrett On May 17, 2022 10:15:15 PM EDT, Aaron Wolf <wolftune@riseup.net> wrote: >FWIW, as a link anyone can use, I put together this some years ago, aiming to be fair and neutral enough while advocating copyleft: > >https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses > >That's probably the ideal link to share in this case IMHO > >On May 17, 2022 2:27:30 PM PDT, Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com> wrote: >>Having one person consider GPL an evil license isn't a big deal. I >>wouldn't waste a lot of time trying to convert him. Nor would I send >>them a link to long essay explaining the situation. wolftune's argument >>is the simplest. However since you already sent him an offensive >>article, I doubt any argument will have much effect at this point. >> >>On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:52 +0800, andrew via libreplanet-discuss >>wrote: >>> Andrew Would https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to >>> indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project >>> based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? >>> Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it >>> ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer >>> ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) >>> Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice >>> Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for >>> bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller >>> ones >>> ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal >>> advice >>> Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but >>> isn't asking for legal advice imo >>> ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the >>> license correctly” >>> Andrew i guess >>> Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? >>> ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free >>> than MIT/BSD >>> nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate >>> Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks >>> Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it >>> ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon >>> Nguyen’s work >>> Andrew yes >>> ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours >>> Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an >>> exception >>> Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and >>> proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether >>> ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? >>> Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your >>> thoughts >>> Andrew meanwhile, >>> https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses >>> explains part of it >>> Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive >>> licenses, but not for the project working on now >>> ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? >>> Andrew I'm working on that >>> ChrisWarrick okay >>> >>> I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain >>> the GPL to them? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> libreplanet-discuss mailing list >>> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org >>> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>libreplanet-discuss mailing list >>libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org >>https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss -- Sent from /e/ Mail. [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/plain, Size: 5328 bytes --] Just a thought about rhetorical approach and wording: the phrase "proprietary fork" could be useful. Also, center the viewpoint of prospective contributors. "A permissive license allows software companies or other entities to make a proprietary fork of a project. This means someone (Developer A) could generously contribute code, then Microsoft (say) could take the project, add their own enhancements, and release a competing version. Developer A contributed expecting she would benefit from others' contributions, yet she is walled off from Microsoft's contributions. She's being played, basically. We want to choose a license that encourages participation, and we think guaranteeing access to future contributions without the possibility of a proprietary fork best serves that. "It's obvious why proprietary software companies prefer that projects use permissive licenses, but when picking a license, I'm not particularly concerned with what Google, Microsoft, or Apple prefer, or what best integrates with their software stack." I add this second bit because I think there's "word on the street" that permissive licenses are more popular and preferred by more, um, entities. But this is like gossip ("people are saying... "). Trace this to origin and I think we would find a few big players loudly and consistently slandering strong licenses. Jim Garrett On May 17, 2022 10:15:15 PM EDT, Aaron Wolf <wolftune@riseup.net> wrote: FWIW, as a link anyone can use, I put together this some years ago, aiming to be fair and neutral enough while advocating copyleft: [1]https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses That's probably the ideal link to share in this case IMHO On May 17, 2022 2:27:30 PM PDT, Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com> wrote : Having one person consider GPL an evil license isn't a big deal. I wouldn't waste a lot of time trying to convert him. Nor would I send them a link to long essay explaining the situation. wolftune's argument is the simplest. However since you already sent him an offensive article, I doubt any argument will have much effect at this point. On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:52 +0800, andrew via libreplanet-discuss wrote: Andrew Would [2]https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ suffice to indicate extending an existing Expat (MIT) project into a project based on the original work but licensed under the (A)GPL? Andrew ugh, forgot to place the agpl in it ChrisWarrick ask a lawyer ChrisWarrick (and consider a less evil license) Andrew Not asking for legal advice, just general practice Andrew And I don't consider the GPLs to be evil, I use them for bigger projects while I use public domain (unlicense) for smaller ones ChrisWarrick licenses are legal stuff, so you are asking for legal advice Andrew asking stuff like 'does the US have any laws' is legal but isn't asking for legal advice imo ChrisWarrick your question is “am I interpeting and using the license correctly” Andrew i guess Andrew and why do you think the gpl is evil? ChrisWarrick GPL, and especially AGPL, makes your code less free than MIT/BSD nedbat Andrew: this is a classic debate Andrew ChrisWarrick: PM me, thanks Andrew because I want to prevent people from proprietizing it ChrisWarrick but at the same time, you’re benefitting from Brandon Nguyen’s work Andrew yes ChrisWarrick but he isn’t able to benefit from yours Andrew they could use the AGPL/GPL, and they could ask me for an exception Andrew the greater danger is people taking expat code and proprietizing it, hindering free use altogether ChrisWarrick what is wrong with proprietary use though? Andrew i'll get back to you with an article tomorrow, thanks on your thoughts Andrew meanwhile, [3]https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-lic enses explains part of it Andrew dont agree to all of it, i see a lot of use of permissive licenses, but not for the project working on now ChrisWarrick do you have a less offensive article? Andrew I'm working on that ChrisWarrick okay I hope this is clear enough on what I need ... well, how do I explain the GPL to them? _______________________________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org [4]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus s _______________________________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org [5]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus s -- Sent from /e/ Mail. References 1. https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses 2. https://git.andrewyu.org/pygame-multiplayer/ 3. https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuck-licenses 4. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss 5. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --] _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-18 16:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-05-17 15:52 People calling the GPLs 'evil licenses' - action plan? andrew via libreplanet-discuss 2022-05-17 16:20 ` wolftune 2022-05-17 21:27 ` Dennis Payne 2022-05-18 2:15 ` Aaron Wolf 2022-05-18 16:26 ` Jim Garrett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).