git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
	"git\@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Dan Wang <dwwang@google.com>,
	Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 11:39:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqshvkkm86.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708175821.GA29326@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:58:21 -0700")

Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
>>>> More importantly, if we plan to make this configurable and not make
>>>> the limit a hardwired constant of the wire protocol, it may be
>>>> better to advertise push-options capability with the limit, e.g.
>>>> "push-options=32" (or even "push-options=1024/32"), so that the
>>>> client side can count and abort early?
>
> Sorry to butt into the conversation late, but: I am not yet convinced.
>
> Is the idea that if the push options were very large, this would save
> the client from the cost of sending them?  

Not really.  I have no strong opinion on the benefit of limiting
number/size.  Stefan limited the number/size at the receiving end
and made receiving end die with its message.  I was merely trying to
tweak the arrangement so that the sending end can complain with its
own message, possibly in its own language, especially because it was
unclear to me if the die() message on the receiving end would always
go back to the sending end correctly.

> But this comes with a
> downside: the server doesn't get to send an error message about
> where 
> the maximum number of push options can come from (e.g., with a link to
> a page where the limit can be adjusted, or with an explanation of when
> clients tend to run into this problem and what they should do
> instead).

Hmm, interesting point.  That would be better told by the receiving
end, as the way to configure it (if offered) would be different from
installation to installation.

> So I'd like to propose an alternative. What if the client tells the
> server the number of push options early on (and possibly also a cap on
> the length of those push options)?  That way, the client doesn't have
> to waste bit sending the push options but the server gets an
> opportunity to send a helpful error message on sideband 3.
>
> 	server> HEAD\0push-options ...
> 	client> ... commands ...
> 	client> push-options 2
> 	client> my-first-option
> 	client> my-second-option


  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-07  1:12 [PATCHv3 0/4] Push options in C Git Stefan Beller
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] push options: {pre,post}-receive hook learns about push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:20   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:50     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:53       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:41     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:56       ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06         ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 22:09           ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 17:58         ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-07-08 18:39           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-07-08 18:57             ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 21:46               ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:17                 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:21                   ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:29                     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:35                       ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:43                         ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:46                           ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:51                             ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 22:59     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-11 18:42       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] add a test for " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 19:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 20:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:51       ` Stefan Beller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-14 21:49 [PATCHv7 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 17:39 [PATCHv5 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 18:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 19:00     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 19:07       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 19:45         ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:07           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-09  0:31 [PATCHv4 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-09  0:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-10 17:06   ` Shawn Pearce
2016-07-10 18:05     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-12  4:53       ` Shawn Pearce
2016-07-12  5:24     ` Jeff King
2016-06-30  0:59 [RFC PATCHv1 0/4] Push options in C Git Stefan Beller
2016-06-30  0:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-01 17:11   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-01 17:24     ` Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqshvkkm86.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dennis@kaarsemaker.net \
    --cc=dwwang@google.com \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).