From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>, Dan Wang <dwwang@google.com>,
Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 18:35:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160708223533.GA11056@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kbu1ec-8LiFrvnXqFqsjFnEofhjZnxcENa1aA1K56m9Fg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:29:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > In the malicious case, the client says "I'll send you 10 push option
> > with an upper bound of 1024K", and then sends gigabytes anyway. Either
> > way the server has to react to what is sent, not what is promised.
>
> Well that is what the initial patch did via:
>
> + for (i = 0; i < max_options; i++) {
> + char *line;
> + int len;
> +
> + line = packet_read_line(0, &len);
> +
> + if (!line)
> + break;
> +
> + if (len > max_size)
> + die("protocol error: server configuration allows push "
> + "options of size up to %d bytes", max_size);
> +
> + len = strcspn(line, "\n");
> + line[len] = '\0';
> +
> + string_list_append(ret, line);
> + }
> + if (i == max_options)
> + die("protocol error: server configuration only allows up "
> + "to %d push options", max_options);
>
> I assume the die is an effective way to "stop receiving".
>
> Thinking further about what you said, I think the initial selections of
> max_size and max_options is sufficient and we only see those bounds in
> the malicious case.
>
> This discussion rather makes me wonder if we want to stick to the initial design
> as it was easy and not overcomplicating things as we assume the abort case
> doesn't occur often.
Yes. I haven't been following the intermediate discussion and patches,
but I don't see anything wrong with the general design above. I think
you do need to use rp_error() to get the die message to the client for
non-ssh cases, though (that is a problem with other protocol-error
messages, too; I wonder if we should install a custom die handler, or
convert them all to some kind of rp_die()).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 1:12 [PATCHv3 0/4] Push options in C Git Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] push options: {pre,post}-receive hook learns about push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:50 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:41 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:56 ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 22:09 ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 17:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-07-08 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 18:57 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 21:46 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:17 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:21 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:29 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:35 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-07-08 22:43 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:46 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:51 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 22:59 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-11 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] add a test for " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:51 ` Stefan Beller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-14 21:49 [PATCHv7 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 17:39 [PATCHv5 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 18:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 19:00 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 19:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 19:45 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-09 0:31 [PATCHv4 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-09 0:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-10 17:06 ` Shawn Pearce
2016-07-10 18:05 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-12 4:53 ` Shawn Pearce
2016-07-12 5:24 ` Jeff King
2016-06-30 0:59 [RFC PATCHv1 0/4] Push options in C Git Stefan Beller
2016-06-30 0:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-01 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-01 17:24 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160708223533.GA11056@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dennis@kaarsemaker.net \
--cc=dwwang@google.com \
--cc=e@80x24.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).