git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, e@80x24.org, peff@peff.net,
	dwwang@google.com, dennis@kaarsemaker.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] push: accept push options
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:52:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq60shp3w9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160707011218.3690-4-sbeller@google.com> (Stefan Beller's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:12:17 -0700")

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> +-L::
> +--push-option::
> +	Transmit the given string to the server, which passes them to
> +	the pre-receive as well as the post-receive hook. Only C strings
> +	containing no new lines are allowed.

This is to affect what happens at the remote end, so I would have
understood "-R".  I also would have understood "-P" as a short-hand
for "--push-option".  What is the justification of "-L"?

What does "C strings" mean?  Did you mean to say "A sequence of
bytes excluding NUL is passed verbatim"?

I do not think I saw anything in the code I reviewed so far that
requires "no LF" limitation.

... Ahh, OK, you want to make sure that push-options are
one-per-line in the push certificate.  While I do not think it is
absolutely necessary, starting with a possibly tighter than
necessary limitation is much better than starting loose and having
to tighten it later.

>  	} else {
>  		struct transport *transport =
>  			transport_get(remote, NULL);
> -
> +		if (flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_OPTIONS)
> +			transport->push_options = push_options;

The result would be easier to read without the removal of a blank
that separates decl/defn and stmt here.

> @@ -533,6 +542,7 @@ int cmd_push(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		  0, "signed", &push_cert, "yes|no|if-asked", N_("GPG sign the push"),
>  		  PARSE_OPT_OPTARG, option_parse_push_signed },
>  		OPT_BIT(0, "atomic", &flags, N_("request atomic transaction on remote side"), TRANSPORT_PUSH_ATOMIC),
> +		OPT_STRING_LIST('o', "push-option", &push_options, N_("server-specific"), N_("option to transmit")),

Here it seems to expect "-o".  If we really want a short option,
"-o" would probably be OK, as I do not think "git push" wants to
have "send the output to this file" option.

> diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
> index 299d303..c943560 100644
> --- a/send-pack.c
> +++ b/send-pack.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static int generate_push_cert(struct strbuf *req_buf,
>  			      const char *push_cert_nonce)
>  {
>  	const struct ref *ref;
> +	struct string_list_item *item;
>  	char *signing_key = xstrdup(get_signing_key());
>  	const char *cp, *np;
>  	struct strbuf cert = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -278,6 +279,12 @@ static int generate_push_cert(struct strbuf *req_buf,
>  		strbuf_addf(&cert, "nonce %s\n", push_cert_nonce);
>  	strbuf_addstr(&cert, "\n");
>  
> +	if (args->push_options) {
> +		for_each_string_list_item(item, args->push_options)
> +			strbuf_addf(&cert, "push-option %s\n", item->string);
> +		strbuf_addstr(&cert, "\n");

Why the extra blank?

I would actually have expected to see

	certificate version ...
        pusher ...
        <datestamp>
	pushee ...	# optional
        nonce ...	# optional
        push-option ... # optional
        push-option ... # optional

        <old> <new> <name>
        ...

by adding this between the two lines in the pre-context of this
hunk, i.e.

	if (push_cert_nonce[0])
		strbuf_addf(&cert, "nonce %s\n", push_cert_nonce);
	if (args->push_options)
		for_each_string_list_item(item, args->push_options)
			strbuf_addf(&cert, "push-option %s\n", item->string);
	strbuf_addstr(&cert, "\n");


  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-07  1:12 [PATCHv3 0/4] Push options in C Git Stefan Beller
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] push options: {pre,post}-receive hook learns about push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:20   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:50     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:53       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:41     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:56       ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06         ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 22:09           ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 17:58         ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-07-08 18:39           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 18:57             ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 21:46               ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:17                 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:21                   ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:29                     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:35                       ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:43                         ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:46                           ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:51                             ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:52   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-07-08 22:59     ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-11 18:42       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07  1:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] add a test for " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 19:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 20:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:51       ` Stefan Beller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-14 21:49 [PATCHv7 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 17:39 [PATCHv5 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-14 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-09  0:31 [PATCHv4 0/4] Push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-09  0:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept push options Stefan Beller
2016-06-30  0:59 [RFC PATCHv1 0/4] Push options in C Git Stefan Beller
2016-06-30  0:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept push options Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq60shp3w9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dennis@kaarsemaker.net \
    --cc=dwwang@google.com \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).