From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, e@80x24.org, peff@peff.net,
dwwang@google.com, dennis@kaarsemaker.net,
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Subject: [PATCHv3 0/4] Push options in C Git
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:12:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707011218.3690-1-sbeller@google.com> (raw)
This is not marked for RFC any more, as I do not recall any open points
left for discussion. This addresses the only reply from Eric Wong on patch 3:
diff to v2:
diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index e328276..c943560 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -536,7 +536,8 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
for_each_string_list_item(item, args->push_options)
packet_buf_write(&sb, "%s", item->string);
- write_or_die(out, sb.buf, sb.len);
+
+ write_or_die(out, sb.buf, sb.len);
packet_flush(out);
strbuf_release(&sb);
}
diff --git a/transport.c b/transport.c
index 598bd1f..0298be1 100644
--- a/transport.c
+++ b/transport.c
@@ -641,7 +641,6 @@ struct transport *transport_get(struct remote *remote, const char *url)
struct transport *ret = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*ret));
ret->progress = isatty(2);
- ret->push_options = NULL;
if (!remote)
die("No remote provided to transport_get()");
Cover letter v2:
================
Allow a user to pass information along a push to the pre/post-receive hook
on the remote.
Jeff writes on v1:
> Whereas in Dennis's patches, it was about specific information directly
> related to the act of pushing.
This allows to transmit arbitrary information as the backends of $VENDOR
may have different options available related to the direct act of pushing.
Thanks,
Stefan
Cover letter v1:
================
Allow a user to pass information along a push to the pre/post-receive hook
on the remote.
When using a remote that is more than just a plain Git host (e.g. Gerrit,
Git{hub/lab}, etc) this may become more obvious: The (server backend specific)
push options can instruct the server to:
* open a pull request
* send out emails asking for review
* (un)trigger continuous integration
* set priority for continuous integration (i.e. bots pushing may ask to be
treated with lower priority compared to humans)
* ...
Most of these actions can be done on the client side as well,
but in these remote-centric workflows it is easier to do that on the remote,
which is why we need to transport the information there.
More concrete examples:
* When you want a change in Gerrit to be submitted to refs/heads/master, you
push instead to a magic branch refs/for/master and Gerrit will create a change
for you (similar to a pull request). Instead we could imagine that you push
to a magical refs/heads/master with a push option "create-change".
* When pushing to Gerrit you can already attach some of this information by
adding a '%' followed by the parameter to the ref, i.e. when interacting with
Gerrit it is possible to do things like[1]:
git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master%draft%topic=example%cc=jon.doe@example.org
This is not appealing to our users as it looks like hacks upon hacks to make
it work. It would read better if it was spelled as:
git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master \
--push-option draft \
--push-option topic=example \
--push-option cc=jon.doe@example.org
(with a short form that is even easier to type,
but this is is more intuitive already)
This is a patch series to Git core, which is developed at the same time
as a change is proposed to JGit by Dan Wang, see [2].
This code is also available at [3].
Thanks,
Stefan
[1] Not all Gerrit '%' options are documented, so here is a link to source code instead :(
https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/refs/heads/master/gerrit-server/src/main/java/com/google/gerrit/server/git/ReceiveCommits.java#1141
[2] https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/74570/
[3] https://github.com/stefanbeller/git/tree/pushoptions
Stefan Beller (4):
push options: {pre,post}-receive hook learns about push options
receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving push options
push: accept push options
add a test for push options
Documentation/config.txt | 7 +-
Documentation/git-push.txt | 8 ++-
Documentation/githooks.txt | 4 ++
Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 10 +--
Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt | 8 +++
builtin/push.c | 16 ++++-
builtin/receive-pack.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++----
send-pack.c | 29 ++++++++
send-pack.h | 3 +
t/t5544-push-options.sh | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++
transport.c | 2 +
transport.h | 7 ++
12 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t5544-push-options.sh
--
2.9.0.141.gdd65b60
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 1:12 Stefan Beller [this message]
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] push options: {pre,post}-receive hook learns about push options Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:50 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] receive-pack: implement advertising and receiving " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:41 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 21:56 ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 22:09 ` Jeff King
2016-07-07 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 17:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-07-08 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 18:57 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 21:46 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:17 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:21 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:29 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:35 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:43 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-08 22:46 ` Jeff King
2016-07-08 22:51 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] push: accept " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-08 22:59 ` Stefan Beller
2016-07-11 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 1:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] add a test for " Stefan Beller
2016-07-07 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-07 21:51 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160707011218.3690-1-sbeller@google.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=dennis@kaarsemaker.net \
--cc=dwwang@google.com \
--cc=e@80x24.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).