Re: [PATCH] ci/install-depends: attempt to fix "brew cask" stuff

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> The downside, of course, is that a failure that will happen on every
> platform will mean wasted CPU to trigger the same failure over and over.
> But:
>
>   - I rarely see that myself, because I wouldn't bother pushing up to CI
>     until "make test" passed locally. So usually I'm finding portability
>     issues via CI. Other people might be different, though.

This is the same for me.

>   - we already have the Windows tests in a separate matrix anyway, so a
>     failure on Linux would run the whole Windows suite (which is an
>     order of magnitude more expensive)

But they tend to finish earlier than OSX and Ubuntu jobs; their
sharding of the tests into 10 jobs may probably have something to do
with this. 

>   - even within the Windows matrix, I think running the rest of the
>     tests after a failure is still valuable. If there's a second
>     failure, you save a round-trip to CI (so it doesn't reduce CPU, but
>     it may help latency to reach a passing state).