From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Michael Strawbridge <michael.strawbridge@amd.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "send-email: extract email-parsing code into a subroutine"
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 12:45:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTJaVzt75r0iHPzR@ugly> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020101310.GB2673716@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:13:10AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>But one thing that gives me pause is that the neither before or after
>this patch do we handle continuation lines like:
>
> Subject: this is the beginning
> and this is more subject
>
>And it would probably be a lot easier to add when storing the headers in
>a hash (it's not impossible to do it the other way, but you basically
>have to delay processing each line with a small state machine).
>
that seems like a rather significant point, doesn't it?
>So another option is to just fix the individual bugs separately.
>
... so that seems preferable to me, given that the necessary fixes seem
rather trivial.
> I guess "readable" is up for debate here, but I find the inline handling
> a lot easier to follow
>
any particular reason for that?
> (and it's half as many lines; most of the diffstat is the new tests).
>- if ($parsed_email{'From'}) {
>- $sender = delete($parsed_email{'From'});
>- }
this verbosity could be cut down somewhat using just
$sender = delete($parsed_email{'From'});
and if the value can be pre-set and needs to be preserved,
$sender = delete($parsed_email{'From'}) // $sender;
but this seems kind of counter-productive legibility-wise.
regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 9:27 [REGRESSION] uninitialized value $address in git send-email when given multiple recipients separated by commas Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-24 3:36 ` Jeff King
2023-09-25 7:45 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-25 8:00 ` Jeff King
2023-09-25 14:48 ` Todd Zullinger
2023-09-25 16:17 ` Jeff King
2023-10-11 13:41 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-10-11 19:27 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-11 20:22 ` [PATCH] send-email: move process_address_list earlier to avoid, uninitialized address error Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-11 20:25 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-11 21:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-11 22:18 ` Jeff King
2023-10-11 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-11 22:47 ` Jeff King
2023-10-13 20:25 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-20 6:45 ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 7:14 ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:03 ` [PATCH 0/3] some send-email --compose fixes Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] doc/send-email: mention handling of "reply-to" with --compose Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "send-email: extract email-parsing code into a subroutine" Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:45 ` Oswald Buddenhagen [this message]
2023-10-23 18:40 ` Jeff King
2023-10-23 19:50 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-25 6:11 ` Jeff King
2023-10-25 9:23 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-27 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-30 9:13 ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 21:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 18:47 ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] send-email: handle to/cc/bcc from --compose message Jeff King
2023-10-20 17:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2023-10-20 21:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] some send-email --compose fixes Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 18:51 ` Jeff King
2023-10-24 20:12 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-24 20:19 ` [PATCH] send-email: move validation code below process_address_list Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-24 21:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-24 22:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-25 18:48 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-26 12:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-26 13:11 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-25 6:50 ` [PATCH] " Jeff King
2023-10-25 18:47 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-25 7:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-27 13:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20 2:50 ` [PATCH] send-email: move process_address_list earlier to avoid, uninitialized address error Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-26 11:33 ` [REGRESSION] uninitialized value $address in git send-email when given multiple recipients separated by commas Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTJaVzt75r0iHPzR@ugly \
--to=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=michael.strawbridge@amd.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).