git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Michael Strawbridge <michael.strawbridge@amd.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] some send-email --compose fixes
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:12:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <393f598e-c7cd-4dc6-a221-9aed7ffcc2b1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231023185152.GC1537181@coredump.intra.peff.net>



On 10/23/23 14:51, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:42:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
>>> So here's the fix in a cleaned up form, guided by my own comments from
>>> earlier. ;) I think this is actually all orthogonal to the patch you are
>>> working on, so yours could either go on top or just be applied
>>> separately.
>>>
>>>   [1/3]: doc/send-email: mention handling of "reply-to" with --compose
>>>   [2/3]: Revert "send-email: extract email-parsing code into a subroutine"
>>>   [3/3]: send-email: handle to/cc/bcc from --compose message
>>
>> Nice.
>>
>> With the approach suggested to move the validation down to where the
>> necessary addresses are already all defined, Michael observed "whoa,
>> why am I getting stringified array ref?".  If that is the only issue
>> in the approach, queuing these three patches first and then have
>> Michael's fix on top of them sounds like the cleanest thing to do.

Patch coming soon.
> 
> I don't think it is even an issue in Michael's approach. I'd have to see
> his patch and how he tested it to be sure, but I suspect he was simply
> being extra careful to test nearby behavior and stumbled upon the
> ARRAY() bug. But the bug was there long before either of his patches.
> 
Thank you for your patches Peff!  I think it fixes the issue I was seeing.
I was trying to be extra careful with my testing.  I had missed testing
--compose and also the multiple --to/cc/bcc examples before.

>> Will queue on top of v2.42.0 to help those who may want to backport
>> these to the maintenance track.
> 
> So I think you could take my series on top of master (or 2.42.0), and
> eventually target 'master'. The bug it fixes is from 2017, so not
> urgent. The reading of "to" headers is a new feature.
> 
> But the fix to move the validation around should probably go directly
> onto a8022c5f7b (send-email: expose header information to
> git-send-email's sendemail-validate hook, 2023-04-19) for use on maint.
> I guess maybe it is not that urgent anymore, as that regression is in
> v2.41, and we would not release anything along that maint track anymore,
> though.
> 
> -Peff


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-22  9:27 [REGRESSION] uninitialized value $address in git send-email when given multiple recipients separated by commas Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-24  3:36 ` Jeff King
2023-09-25  7:45   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-25  8:00     ` Jeff King
2023-09-25 14:48       ` Todd Zullinger
2023-09-25 16:17         ` Jeff King
2023-10-11 13:41           ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-10-11 19:27             ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-11 20:22               ` [PATCH] send-email: move process_address_list earlier to avoid, uninitialized address error Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-11 20:25                 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-11 21:27                 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-11 22:18                   ` Jeff King
2023-10-11 22:37                     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-11 22:47                       ` Jeff King
2023-10-13 20:25                         ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-20  6:45                           ` Jeff King
2023-10-20  7:14                             ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:03                               ` [PATCH 0/3] some send-email --compose fixes Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:09                                 ` [PATCH 1/3] doc/send-email: mention handling of "reply-to" with --compose Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:13                                 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "send-email: extract email-parsing code into a subroutine" Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:45                                   ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-23 18:40                                     ` Jeff King
2023-10-23 19:50                                       ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-25  6:11                                         ` Jeff King
2023-10-25  9:23                                           ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-27 22:31                                             ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-30  9:13                                             ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 21:45                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 18:47                                     ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 10:15                                 ` [PATCH 3/3] send-email: handle to/cc/bcc from --compose message Jeff King
2023-10-20 17:30                                   ` Eric Sunshine
2023-10-20 21:42                                 ` [PATCH 0/3] some send-email --compose fixes Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 18:51                                   ` Jeff King
2023-10-24 20:12                                     ` Michael Strawbridge [this message]
2023-10-24 20:19                                       ` [PATCH] send-email: move validation code below process_address_list Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-24 21:55                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-24 22:03                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-25 18:48                                             ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-25 18:51                                             ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-26 12:44                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-26 13:11                                                 ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-25  6:50                                         ` [PATCH] " Jeff King
2023-10-25 18:47                                           ` Michael Strawbridge
2023-10-25  7:43                                         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-27 13:04                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20  2:50                 ` [PATCH] send-email: move process_address_list earlier to avoid, uninitialized address error Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-26 11:33       ` [REGRESSION] uninitialized value $address in git send-email when given multiple recipients separated by commas Bagas Sanjaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=393f598e-c7cd-4dc6-a221-9aed7ffcc2b1@amd.com \
    --to=michael.strawbridge@amd.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).