From: Eric Rannaud <eric.rannaud@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Serror <jeremy.serror@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: git rebase regression: cannot pass a shell expression directly to --exec
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 10:29:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+zRj8WFuqaNV_6U5=VUrEmeQ_fNaRs8mKxdSd=Z0QMyGk4pHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170516171414.GC2169@alpha.vpn.ikke.info>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> wrote:
>> A transparent optimization that tries execve() then falls back to the
>> user's shell sounds like a good idea.
>
> It does not really work that way. Git runs in a separate process that
> does not have access to your current shell. That's why you need to do
> 'export -f foo'.
>
> If you want git to be able to ecute the foo shell function, git needs to
> start a _new_ shell process, which reads the environment, recognize the
> exported function and run that.
>
> This is not the same as git executing the command in your shell. Not
> exported variables would not be available in this function (as it would
> be in your equivalent).
I'm sorry, I didn't mean (or say) "my shell process". Indeed, it
doesn't work that way. And to be clear, there is no problem with
having to "export -f foo". The only question is how should git run the
<cmd> passed to --exec: should it run directly or using a shell?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-15 18:08 git rebase regression: cannot pass a shell expression directly to --exec Eric Rannaud
2017-05-16 3:25 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 3:37 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 16:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-16 16:47 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 17:11 ` Eric Rannaud
2017-05-16 17:15 ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-16 17:23 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 17:30 ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-16 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-16 19:35 ` [TANGENT] run-command: use vfork instead of fork Eric Wong
2017-05-16 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-16 21:11 ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-16 20:12 ` git rebase regression: cannot pass a shell expression directly to --exec Johannes Schindelin
2017-05-16 20:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-16 17:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-16 3:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-16 3:53 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 4:08 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 16:45 ` Eric Rannaud
2017-05-16 10:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-05-16 10:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-05-16 16:18 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 16:59 ` Eric Rannaud
2017-05-16 17:14 ` Kevin Daudt
2017-05-16 17:29 ` Eric Rannaud [this message]
2017-05-16 17:41 ` Jeff King
2017-05-16 17:21 ` Eric Rannaud
2017-05-16 17:37 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+zRj8WFuqaNV_6U5=VUrEmeQ_fNaRs8mKxdSd=Z0QMyGk4pHw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=eric.rannaud@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jeremy.serror@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ikke.info \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).