From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>,
Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
opticyclic <opticyclic@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:23:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vy5rkkr3y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP2yMa+op58gbUPXvyHdx+cLcCBgHmmuBKGBojxA+puDRPSp1Q@mail.gmail.com> (Scott Chacon's message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:52:53 -0800")
Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com> writes:
> So free is great, but what is more important in the tooling and
> services that help you develop? Is it freedom to some arbitrary
> level, or is it simplicity and availability? I value my time a lot
> more than if I can get the source code to the issue tracker that my
> open source project uses.
I do not particularly want to say this, but I couldn't resist wondering
how the above "The best tool for the job, be it libre or commercial"
compares with what Linus would have had in his mind when the kernel
project decided to use BitKeeper.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-01 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 17:19 Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests opticyclic
2012-02-29 18:23 ` Brian Gernhardt
2012-02-29 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-29 22:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-02-29 23:58 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 0:37 ` Greg Troxel
2012-03-01 0:45 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 0:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-01 1:05 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 1:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-01 1:20 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 5:16 ` Miles Bader
2012-03-01 5:40 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 16:52 ` Scott Chacon
2012-03-01 20:23 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2012-03-01 11:29 ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-01 11:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-03-01 12:46 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 12:28 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-02 4:03 ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-03-02 4:19 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-02 4:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-02 5:50 ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-03-02 6:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-02 7:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-02 14:18 ` Andreas Ericsson
2012-03-02 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-07 8:03 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-07 9:52 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-07 13:04 ` Joern Huxhorn
2012-03-07 13:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-07 14:47 ` Joern Huxhorn
2012-03-07 15:08 ` Pau Garcia i Quiles
2012-03-07 17:18 ` Phil Hord
2012-02-29 19:18 ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-02-29 21:37 ` Sitaram Chamarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vy5rkkr3y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=andrew.ardill@gmail.com \
--cc=gdt@ir.bbn.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=opticyclic@gmail.com \
--cc=schacon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).