git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Cc: Neal Kreitzinger <nkreitzinger@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>,
	Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@gmail.com>,
	opticyclic <opticyclic@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:45:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vk433eyts.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F50D6C6.3080909@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:18:46 +0100")

Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes:

> On 03/02/2012 08:03 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> ... a very concise and exact response.
>
>> In any case, any solution that demands more things to be done by people
>> near the core developers than they currently are already doing will make
>> things worse by exacerbating the problem that comes from a bottleneck in
>> the process.  I do not think your "The maintainer triages and assigns
>> issues to other developers" or "The assigned developer marks the issue as
>> 'done' after fixing it" will fly very well, regardless of the use of any
>> bug tracker.
>
> It works very well when there's the incentive of roof over one's head
> and food on one's table to take care of the assigned issues.

Your "this is a volunteer effort and assignment does not work like corp
environment" is valid, but I think it is missing the point.  A solution
that demands more from people who are already bottlenecks will not work
very well, even in a corporate environment where you have stronger
incentive to fill your assigned role.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-02 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-29 17:19 Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests opticyclic
2012-02-29 18:23 ` Brian Gernhardt
2012-02-29 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-29 22:53   ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-02-29 23:58     ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01  0:37       ` Greg Troxel
2012-03-01  0:45         ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01  0:50           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-01  1:05             ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01  1:05           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-01  1:20             ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01  5:16           ` Miles Bader
2012-03-01  5:40             ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 16:52         ` Scott Chacon
2012-03-01 20:23           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-01 11:29       ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-01 11:54         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-03-01 12:46           ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 12:28         ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-01 17:10         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-02  4:03           ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-03-02  4:19             ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-02  4:21               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-02  5:50               ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-03-02  6:25                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-02  7:03                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-02 14:18                   ` Andreas Ericsson
2012-03-02 16:45                     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2012-03-07  8:03                       ` Andrew Ardill
2012-03-07  9:52                         ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-07 13:04                   ` Joern Huxhorn
2012-03-07 13:53                     ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-07 14:47                       ` Joern Huxhorn
2012-03-07 15:08                     ` Pau Garcia i Quiles
2012-03-07 17:18                   ` Phil Hord
2012-02-29 19:18 ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2012-02-29 21:37 ` Sitaram Chamarty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vk433eyts.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=andrew.ardill@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=nkreitzinger@gmail.com \
    --cc=opticyclic@gmail.com \
    --cc=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).