From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:23:29 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy5rkkr3y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vhay9tqs6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120229225304.GA9099@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Greg Troxel , Andrew Ardill , Jonathan Nieder , opticyclic , git@vger.kernel.org To: Scott Chacon X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 01 21:23:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S3CXK-0006ns-Rx for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:23:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757487Ab2CAUXd (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:23:33 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:57533 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754882Ab2CAUXc (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:23:32 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E642705D; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:23:31 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cWnlqvP0Y4cebqFfi5UFrYyEw3o=; b=TURZk5 VOzJXpqGiVF5LFUmysdhWzDRkcyEk6t3L2ZENuMWzOZSc0P6Kh5NYpK8jAaK647G 0i64d1kIKUKeVHENDHg45z9a0dzDFoIKLQte1FL7Tqmjeq54n7UcGuvNrQQG5W7T 8QbQLwfaG7+FVD62e3c8JQjY/bMAq0h1C/G0I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UBMl+KOzAsMd8Rf+I/j7ovObEanWYd8K Rlcg8nd2ky6f3jFFnUFWYOxek6Xy0SDADRL2Rh5e8/dzTO2x7H2cV09pz9qpoMu6 bECXk3u2kScyTc1zBizkiTR7InYoRhMRW7zmwau/axMe5x8ToVsMOiMZeY+LRP+a LZfQy7bJ+R8= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72441705C; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:23:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F26C47058; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:23:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Scott Chacon's message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:52:53 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6969B6E4-63DC-11E1-968A-9DB42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Scott Chacon writes: > So free is great, but what is more important in the tooling and > services that help you develop? Is it freedom to some arbitrary > level, or is it simplicity and availability? I value my time a lot > more than if I can get the source code to the issue tracker that my > open source project uses. I do not particularly want to say this, but I couldn't resist wondering how the above "The best tool for the job, be it libre or commercial" compares with what Linus would have had in his mind when the kernel project decided to use BitKeeper.