From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <r@artagnon.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
"Miriam R." <mirucam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] bisect--helper: double-check run command on exit code 126 and 127
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:16:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b8ce04e-8f7b-4ed5-a1f2-42aa4d8a7438@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6f7pime.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * Can we have *no* rev that is marked as "good"? I think we made
> it possible to say "my time is more valuable than machine cycles,
> so I'll only tell you that this revision is broken and give you
> no limit on the bottom side of the history. still assume that
> there was only one good-to-bad transition in the history and find
> it" by supplying only one "bad" and no "good" when starting to
> bisect. And in such a case, ...
Hm, this addition might be an unpleasant special-case syntax, breaking both `git bisect start [bad [good]]` and `git bisect bad ...; git bisect start`.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-09 19:29 git bisect bad @ Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-09 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-09 20:48 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-10 9:01 ` [PATCH] bisect: report actual bisect_state() argument on error René Scharfe
2022-01-10 10:04 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-10 17:06 ` git bisect bad @ Junio C Hamano
2022-01-10 21:04 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-12 9:04 ` René Scharfe
2022-01-12 17:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-12 18:34 ` René Scharfe
2022-01-13 5:10 ` René Scharfe
2022-01-13 9:32 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-13 12:28 ` Christian Couder
2022-01-13 13:55 ` René Scharfe
2022-01-13 15:16 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-14 7:47 ` René Scharfe
2022-01-14 8:04 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2022-01-18 12:45 ` René Scharfe
2022-01-14 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-13 18:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-18 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] bisect--helper: report actual bisect_state() argument on error René Scharfe
2022-01-18 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] bisect--helper: release strbuf and strvec on run error René Scharfe
2022-01-18 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] bisect: document run behavior with exit codes 126 and 127 René Scharfe
2022-01-18 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] bisect--helper: double-check run command on exit code " René Scharfe
2022-01-19 2:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-19 7:52 ` René Scharfe
2022-02-04 0:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-04 17:16 ` René Scharfe
2022-02-04 18:16 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2022-02-04 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-04 18:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b8ce04e-8f7b-4ed5-a1f2-42aa4d8a7438@www.fastmail.com \
--to=r@artagnon.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=mirucam@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).