From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D401F852 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377461AbiBDSQ1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 13:16:27 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:45529 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238169AbiBDSQY (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 13:16:24 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051F15C0067; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 13:16:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap46 ([10.202.2.96]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Feb 2022 13:16:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=artagnon.com; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; bh=CFUuTTAIEKvE6gLwvlr9qotstFMVmTuP0qQ642 3fIB4=; b=c1R8VuNjq3Xdudb8P1w1R0vWDDryqkBwFWl2IvyDDE1CC2jUK99e5w UBOWYO3YVuA3wXyBG5ovFon9amLkUMgefM251xka2cvgAcan153Dnho3fePbGluB UxtPfAgPS38ZZA5k4cJKLg9/fP71Bok5SCXJHMe11CHKA1M0LJxbyHE9Mm6LRYrl OSUEih3tHOPHNSFQ720jwx15Phsr3j3tWL5Zm7VmcD4OTuJvskoKJ9zJ+BmV4ixI Vg1mwRWZZiY4MePA8Dwd5ck599wF4pvraV04MAI00s7+A2smIXdWpPKtmDByGJzv p38IO5+ixDqGaDwmwzaQOSFDIMCU0emA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=CFUuTTAIEKvE6gLwv lr9qotstFMVmTuP0qQ6423fIB4=; b=fDnYaEF6AkU3mftsQ4U730P12gr6Vp34/ Gv35YP+Ci0a9cv4UOq8rNlK15RFO4uT9AtSXf2zLQBVhm/6mh7XggF2aj32KB6kh olG6uw68Gt9JTmbI7EX/D6o/CLbGXwgH5pHhcHUIz8QRdYWMHsTjoygA5ap0PGN+ /oRDmiJSRU7MLSkaF3YbbmKChlG5YsfegjJzIyUQ77lanoP+6neqMzs046UcLORo N9YozL70rwBrhh/aQXft3yzQY5VQSWsygEDpw9gy1/ZrbgE3jjmmPf5YReKNazyh 7SK6rs/reOzIkIJfpdvoqCuGwYD6fkaAGGPYw8csJB2eoPl3sDlTg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrgeelgdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdftrghm khhumhgrrhcutfgrmhgrtghhrghnughrrgdfuceorhesrghrthgrghhnohhnrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvgeeutdfhhfegleetvdejheejveegffekheefffefudfh leekteeuuedtjeelffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehrsegrrhhtrghgnhhonhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id BC42A1EE007B; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 13:16:23 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4586-g104bd556f9-fm-20220203.002-g104bd556 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <6b8ce04e-8f7b-4ed5-a1f2-42aa4d8a7438@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1edfc6ff-4db8-447f-9eb7-85843258a286@www.fastmail.com> <20987dc6-e0c7-6ca2-19fd-2b323b3f6d9f@web.de> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:16:03 +0100 From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" To: "Junio C Hamano" , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Scharfe?= Cc: "Git List" , "Christian Couder" , "Miriam R." Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] bisect--helper: double-check run command on exit code 126 and 127 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > * Can we have *no* rev that is marked as "good"? I think we made > it possible to say "my time is more valuable than machine cycles, > so I'll only tell you that this revision is broken and give you > no limit on the bottom side of the history. still assume that > there was only one good-to-bad transition in the history and find > it" by supplying only one "bad" and no "good" when starting to > bisect. And in such a case, ... Hm, this addition might be an unpleasant special-case syntax, breaking both `git bisect start [bad [good]]` and `git bisect bad ...; git bisect start`. R.