Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT

[sf <sf-gmane@stephan-feder.de>]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, sf wrote:
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> ...
>>> In contrast, a submodule that we don't fetch is an all-or-nothing 
>>> situation: we simply don't have the data at all, and it's really a matter 
>>> of simply not recursing into that submodule at all - much more like not 
>>> checking out a particular part of the tree.
>> If you do not want to fetch all of the supermodule then do not fetch the
>> supermodule.
> 
> So why do you want to limit it? There's absolutely no cost to saying "I 
> want to see all the common shared infrastructure, but I'm actually only 
> interested in this one submodule that I work with".

If you need a common infrastructure to be able to work with the
submodule, then the submodule is not independent of of the supermodule.
I see a contradiction in your requirements.

> Also, anybody who works on just the build infrastructure simply may not 
> care about all the submodules. The submodules may add up to hundreds of 
> gigs of stuff. Not everybody wants them. But you may still want to get the 
> common build infrastructure.

See above.

> In other words, your "all or nothing" approach is
>  (a) not friendly
> and
>  (b) has no real advantages anyway, since modules have to be independent 
>      enough that you _can_ split them off for other reasons anyway.
> 
> So forcing that "you have to take everything" mentality onyl has 
> negatives, and no positives. Why do it?

(There have been lots of use cases for shallow clones but for a long
time git did not support them).

If you can extend this partial fetch feature to the non-subproject case
I would agree with your reasoning. What makes the subprojects so special
in this regard. Do I have to turn a plain tree into a subproject to be
able to ignore it? Once you can restrict fetches to parts of the
contents you get the ability to restrict fetches to the "common
infrastructure" and selected submodules for free.

Regards

Stephan