From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
"Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "fetch: default to protocol version 2"
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:40:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422194047.GD558336@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422155047.GB91734@google.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:50:47AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> This reverts commit 684ceae32dae726c6a5c693b257b156926aba8b7.
>
> Users fetching from linux-next and other kernel remotes are reporting
> that the limited ref advertisement causes negotiation to reach
> MAX_IN_VAIN, resulting in too-large fetches.
OK, now that we have data I think this strategy is reasonable.
That said, it will take a while to make it to a release, so we very well
may have brought v2 and v0 to parity in the meantime.
> > To get you unstuck, the immediate workaround is to drop back to the
> > older protocol, like:
> >
> > git -c protocol.version=0 fetch --all
>
> By the way, I'd recommend the immediate workaround of
>
> git fetch --negotiation-tip=refs/remotes/xo/* xo
>
> instead. But that's a separate subject.
It seems like if we are fetching with refspec X/*:Y/* that we should
perhaps automatically select our local Y/* negotiation tips.
That said, neither it (nor the manual version above) would help the case
I've been testing with. It's a first fetch from "xo", which can reuse
history we already have from other remotes.
I agree it's a good workaround for folks doing their daily fetches,
though.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 8:42 Git 2.26 fetches many times more objects than it should, wasting gigabytes Lubomir Rintel
2020-04-22 9:57 ` Jeff King
2020-04-22 10:30 ` Jeff King
2020-04-22 10:40 ` Jeff King
2020-04-22 15:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-22 19:33 ` Jeff King
2020-04-23 21:37 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-04-23 21:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-24 5:32 ` Jeff King
2020-04-22 15:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-22 19:36 ` Jeff King
2020-04-22 15:50 ` [PATCH] Revert "fetch: default to protocol version 2" Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-22 18:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-22 19:40 ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-04-22 19:47 ` Jeff King
2020-04-22 16:53 ` Git 2.26 fetches many times more objects than it should, wasting gigabytes Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-22 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-22 19:18 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200422194047.GD558336@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lkundrak@v3.sk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).