git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitter.spiros@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Makefile: add cppcheck target
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:28:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213122854.pphyp342tstxbbqe@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161213121510.5o5axuwzztbxcvfd@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:15:10AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> I think these last two are a good sign that we need to be feeding the
> list of source files to cppcheck. I tried your patch and it also started
> looking in t/perf/build, which are old versions of git built to serve
> the performance-testing suite.
> 
> See the way that the "tags" target is handled for a possible approach.

Maybe something like this:

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 8b5976d88..e7684ae63 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2638,4 +2638,6 @@ cover_db_html: cover_db
 .PHONY: cppcheck
 
 cppcheck:
-	cppcheck --force --quiet --inline-suppr $(CPPCHECK_ADD) .
+	$(FIND_SOURCE_FILES) |\
+	grep -v ^t/t |\
+	xargs cppcheck --force --quiet --inline-suppr $(CPPCHECK_ADD)

> My main complaint with any static checker is how we can handle false
> positives. [...]

Here's what that generates on my machine, with annotations:

[builtin/am.c:766]: (error) Resource leak: in

  Correct.

[builtin/notes.c:260]: (error) Memory pointed to by 'buf' is freed twice.
[builtin/notes.c:264]: (error) Memory pointed to by 'buf' is freed twice.

  Nope. It appears not to understand that die() does not return.

[builtin/rev-list.c:391]: (error) Uninitialized variable: reaches
[builtin/rev-list.c:391]: (error) Uninitialized variable: all

  These are "int foo = foo" (which is ugly, and maybe we can get rid of
  if compilers have gotten smart enough to figure it out).

[compat/nedmalloc/malloc.c.h:4646]: (error) Memory leak: mem

  Hard to tell, but I think this is wrong and is confused by pointer
  arithmetic on the malloc chunks.

[compat/regex/regcomp.c:3086]: (error) Memory leak: sbcset

  Nope, this return is hit only when sbcset is NULL. The tool is
  presumably confused by a conditional hidden inside a macro.

[compat/regex/regcomp.c:3634]: (error) Memory leak: sbcset
[compat/regex/regcomp.c:3086]: (error) Memory leak: mbcset
[compat/regex/regcomp.c:3634]: (error) Memory leak: mbcset

  I didn't look at these, but presumably similar.

[compat/regex/regcomp.c:2802]: (error) Uninitialized variable: table_size
[compat/regex/regcomp.c:2805]: (error) Uninitialized variable: table_size

  Not sure, but it looks like this function declares another inline
  function inside its scope, and that confuses the tool.

[compat/regex/regcomp.c:532]: (error) Memory leak: fastmap

  Nope. Tool seems confused by hiding free() in a macro.

[contrib/examples/builtin-fetch--tool.c:420]: (error) Uninitialized variable: lrr_count
[contrib/examples/builtin-fetch--tool.c:427]: (error) Uninitialized variable: lrr_list

  More "int foo = foo". Might be worth omitting contrib/examples (or
  possibly contrib/ entirely) from the check.

[t/helper/test-hashmap.c:125]: (error) Memory leak: entries
[t/helper/test-hashmap.c:125]: (error) Memory leak: hashes

  Correct (but unimportant).

So I think it is capable of finding real problems, but I think we'd need
some way of squelching false positives, preferably in a way that carries
forward as the code changes (so not just saying "foo.c:1234 is a false
positive", which will break when it becomes "foo.c:1235").

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13  9:22 [RFC/PATCH] Makefile: add cppcheck target Chris Packham
2016-12-13  9:32 ` Chris Packham
2016-12-13  9:37   ` stefan.naewe
2016-12-13 12:15 ` Jeff King
2016-12-13 12:28   ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-12-14  8:23     ` Chris Packham
2016-12-14  8:33   ` Chris Packham
2016-12-14 11:18     ` Jeff King
2016-12-14  9:27 ` [RFC/PATCHv2] " Chris Packham
2016-12-14 11:24   ` Jeff King
2016-12-14 14:46     ` Jeff King
2016-12-15 23:22     ` [RFC/PATCH] Makefile: suppress some cppcheck false-positives Chris Packham
2016-12-16 18:43       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-16 22:16         ` Jeff King
     [not found]     ` <6ABA4AA4-BD5C-4178-BB3B-91CA045EA2AD@gmail.com>
2016-12-17  7:31       ` [RFC/PATCHv2] Makefile: add cppcheck target Chris Packham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161213122854.pphyp342tstxbbqe@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitter.spiros@gmail.com \
    --cc=judge.packham@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).