git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
To: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/11] dir.c: improve docs for match_pathspec() and match_pathspec_depth()
Date: Sun,  6 Jan 2013 16:58:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357491493-11619-5-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357491493-11619-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org>

Fix a grammatical issue in the description of these functions, and
make it more obvious how and why seen[] can be reused across multiple
invocations.

Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
---
 dir.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 dir.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
index 46f362e..547b83f 100644
--- a/dir.c
+++ b/dir.c
@@ -167,12 +167,19 @@ static int match_one(const char *match, const char *name, int namelen)
 }
 
 /*
- * Given a name and a list of pathspecs, see if the name matches
- * any of the pathspecs.  The caller is also interested in seeing
- * all pathspec matches some names it calls this function with
- * (otherwise the user could have mistyped the unmatched pathspec),
- * and a mark is left in seen[] array for pathspec element that
- * actually matched anything.
+ * Given a name and a list of pathspecs, returns the nature of the
+ * closest (i.e. most specific) match of the name to any of the
+ * pathspecs.
+ *
+ * The caller typically calls this multiple times with the same
+ * pathspec and seen[] array but with different name/namelen
+ * (e.g. entries from the index) and is interested in seeing if and
+ * how each pathspec matches all the names it calls this function
+ * with.  A mark is left in the seen[] array for each pathspec element
+ * indicating the closest type of match that element achieved, so if
+ * seen[n] remains zero after multiple invocations, that means the nth
+ * pathspec did not match any names, which could indicate that the
+ * user mistyped the nth pathspec.
  */
 int match_pathspec(const char **pathspec, const char *name, int namelen,
 		int prefix, char *seen)
@@ -239,12 +246,19 @@ static int match_pathspec_item(const struct pathspec_item *item, int prefix,
 }
 
 /*
- * Given a name and a list of pathspecs, see if the name matches
- * any of the pathspecs.  The caller is also interested in seeing
- * all pathspec matches some names it calls this function with
- * (otherwise the user could have mistyped the unmatched pathspec),
- * and a mark is left in seen[] array for pathspec element that
- * actually matched anything.
+ * Given a name and a list of pathspecs, returns the nature of the
+ * closest (i.e. most specific) match of the name to any of the
+ * pathspecs.
+ *
+ * The caller typically calls this multiple times with the same
+ * pathspec and seen[] array but with different name/namelen
+ * (e.g. entries from the index) and is interested in seeing if and
+ * how each pathspec matches all the names it calls this function
+ * with.  A mark is left in the seen[] array for each pathspec element
+ * indicating the closest type of match that element achieved, so if
+ * seen[n] remains zero after multiple invocations, that means the nth
+ * pathspec did not match any names, which could indicate that the
+ * user mistyped the nth pathspec.
  */
 int match_pathspec_depth(const struct pathspec *ps,
 			 const char *name, int namelen,
diff --git a/dir.h b/dir.h
index dd42a3a..136e838 100644
--- a/dir.h
+++ b/dir.h
@@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ struct dir_struct {
 	char basebuf[PATH_MAX];
 };
 
+/*
+ * The ordering of these constants is significant, with
+ * higher-numbered match types signifying "closer" (i.e. more
+ * specific) matches which will override lower-numbered match types
+ * when populating the seen[] array.
+ */
 #define MATCHED_RECURSIVELY 1
 #define MATCHED_FNMATCH 2
 #define MATCHED_EXACTLY 3
-- 
1.7.11.7.33.gb8feba5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-06 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-03 19:17 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2013, #02; Thu, 3) Junio C Hamano
2013-01-04 17:23 ` Adam Spiers
2013-01-04 21:13   ` as/check-ignore (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2013, #02; Thu, 3)) Junio C Hamano
2013-01-06 16:17     ` Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58       ` [PATCH v4 00/11] new git check-ignore sub-command Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 01/11] dir.c: use a single struct exclude_list per source of excludes Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 02/11] dir.c: keep track of where patterns came from Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 03/11] dir.c: provide clear_directory() for reclaiming dir_struct memory Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` Adam Spiers [this message]
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 05/11] add.c: remove unused argument from validate_pathspec() Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 06/11] add.c: move pathspec matchers into new pathspec.c for reuse Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 07/11] pathspec.c: rename newly public functions for clarity Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 08/11] add.c: extract check_path_for_gitlink() from treat_gitlinks() for reuse Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 09/11] add.c: extract new die_if_path_beyond_symlink() " Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 10/11] setup.c: document get_pathspec() Adam Spiers
2013-01-06 16:58         ` [PATCH v4 11/11] add git-check-ignore sub-command Adam Spiers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1357491493-11619-5-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org \
    --to=git@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).