From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] compat: add qsort_s()
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <955e9bf4-d1cd-f01a-13f1-7a335dea011a@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161201201917.nqx3v5fl2ptl3bhr@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Am 01.12.2016 um 21:19 schrieb Jeff King:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:14:42PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>>
>>> To make matters more fun, apparently[1] there are multiple variants of
>>> qsort_r with different argument orders. _And_ apparently Microsoft
>>> defines qsort_s, but it's not quite the same thing. But all of that can
>>> be dealt with by having more specific flags (HAVE_GNU_QSORT_R, etc).
AFAIU it went like this:
// FreeBSD 5.0 (2003)
void qsort_r(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,
void *context,
int (*compar)(void *context, const void *x, const void *y));
// Microsoft Visual Studio 2005
void qsort_s(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,
int (*compar)(void *context, const void *x, const void *y),
void *context);
// glibc 2.8 (2008)
void qsort_r(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,
int (*compar)(const void *x, const void *y, void *context),
void *context);
// C11 Annex K (2011)
errno_t qsort_s(void *base, rsize_t nmemb, rsize_t size,
int (*compar)(const void *x, const void *y, void *context),
void *context);
>>> It just seems like we should be able to do a better job of using the
>>> system qsort in many cases.
Sure, platform-specific implementations can be shorter.
>> If we were to go that route, perhaps we shouldn't have HAVE_QSORT_S
>> so that Microsoft folks won't define it by mistake (instead perhaps
>> call it HAVE_ISO_QSORT_S or something).
OK.
>> I like your suggestion in general. The body of git_qsort_s() on
>> systems without ISO_QSORT_S can do
>>
>> - GNU qsort_r() without any change in the parameters,
>>
>> - Microsoft qsort_s() with parameter reordered, or
>>
>> - Apple/BSD qsort_r() with parameter reordered.
>>
>> and that would cover the major platforms.
Yes.
However, for MSys INTERNAL_QSORT is defined for some reason, so the
platform's qsort(3) is not used there; I guess the same reason applies
to qsort_s(). If it doesn't then an implementation may want to convert
a call to the invalid parameter handler (which may show a dialog
offering to Retry, Continue or Abort) into a non-zero return value.
>> Eh, wait. BSD and Microsoft have paramters reordered in the
>> callback comparison function. I suspect that would not fly very
>> well.
>
> You can hack around it by passing a wrapper callback that flips the
> arguments. Since we have a "void *" data pointer, that would point to a
> struct holding the "real" callback and chaining to the original data
> pointer.
>
> It does incur the cost of an extra level of indirection for each
> comparison, though (not just for each qsort call).
Indeed. We'd need a perf test to measure that overhead before we could
determine if that's a problem, though.
> You could do it as zero-cost if you were willing to turn the comparison
> function definition into a macro.
Ugh. That either requires changing the signature of qsort_s() based on
the underlying native function as well, or using a void pointer to pass
the comparison function, no? Let's not do that, at least not without a
good reason.
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] string-list: make string_list_sort() reentrant René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] compat: add qsort_s() René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:31 ` René Scharfe
2016-12-01 19:35 ` Jeff King
2016-12-01 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 20:19 ` Jeff King
2016-12-01 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 22:30 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2016-12-01 23:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 20:26 ` Jeff King
2016-12-12 19:51 ` René Scharfe
2016-12-12 19:57 ` Jeff King
2016-12-21 9:36 ` René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] add QSORT_S René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] string-list: use QSORT_S in string_list_sort() René Scharfe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=955e9bf4-d1cd-f01a-13f1-7a335dea011a@web.de \
--to=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).