git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] compat: add qsort_s()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:36:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2203c696-3a86-626b-c516-285daef15022@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161212195703.nmljhwwmrn56gbyd@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Am 12.12.2016 um 20:57 schrieb Jeff King:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:51:14PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> It's kinda cool to have a bespoke compatibility layer for major platforms,
>> but the more I think about it the less I can answer why we would want that.
>> Safety, reliability and performance can't be good reasons -- if our fallback
>> function lacks in these regards then we have to improve it in any case.
>
> There may be cases that we don't want to support because of portability
> issues. E.g., if your libc has an assembly-optimized qsort() we wouldn't
> want to replicate that.

Offloading to GPUs might be a better example; I don't know of a libc 
that does any of that, though (yet).

> I dunno. I am not that opposed to just saying "forget libc qsort, we
> always use our internal one which is consistent, performant, and safe".
> But when I suggested something similar for our regex library, I seem to
> recall there were complaints.

Well, I'm not sure how comparable they are, but perhaps we can avoid 
compat code altogether in this case.  Patch coming in a new thread.

René

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-21  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-01 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] string-list: make string_list_sort() reentrant René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] compat: add qsort_s() René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:31   ` René Scharfe
2016-12-01 19:35   ` Jeff King
2016-12-01 20:14     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 20:19       ` Jeff King
2016-12-01 20:25         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 22:30         ` René Scharfe
2016-12-01 23:37           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 20:22       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-12-01 20:26         ` Jeff King
2016-12-12 19:51         ` René Scharfe
2016-12-12 19:57           ` Jeff King
2016-12-21  9:36             ` René Scharfe [this message]
2016-12-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] add QSORT_S René Scharfe
2016-12-01 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] string-list: use QSORT_S in string_list_sort() René Scharfe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2203c696-3a86-626b-c516-285daef15022@web.de \
    --to=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).