* Re: sox-users and sox-devel @ marc.info
[not found] ` <20170630162011.GF13131@marklar.spinoli.org>
@ 2017-06-30 16:44 ` Jan Stary
2017-06-30 18:14 ` Eric Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stary @ 2017-06-30 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sox-users, sox-devel
marc.info is aware of the SF re-subscriptions
and is takign care of it, so
http://marc.info/?l=sox-users&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=sox-devel&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=sox-commits&r=1&w=2
(and other SF lists) will continue being archived.
Jan
On Jun 30 10:20:11, hlein@marc.info wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:33:34AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Jun 30 10:30:27, hans@stare.cz wrote:
> > > Recently, SF has asked each and every subscriber (it seems)
> > > to reconfirm their subscription to all SF mlists.
> > >
> > > I assume marc.info is itself subscribed to sox-*
> > > and that's how it gets copies of the messages (right?).
> > >
> > > What does that mean for continuing to archive sox-* ?
> > > Does marc.info need to reconfirm all its SF subscriptions?
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=sox-devel&m=149708246222731&w=2
>
> Oh my - thanks for letting me know. Indeed MARC is subscribed with a
> bunch of list-name@marc.info aliases. And every one of those got such a
> message over the past three weeks that I did not notice:
>
> https://marc.info/?t=149695721700001&r=5&w=2
>
> Time for some scripted clicky clickies. I will start with the sox lists :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread