* [ruby-core:96818] [Ruby master Misc#16507] =~ vs include? or match?
[not found] <redmine.issue-16507.20200112232707@ruby-lang.org>
@ 2020-01-12 23:27 ` Greg.mpls
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Greg.mpls @ 2020-01-12 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ruby-core
Issue #16507 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
----------------------------------------
Misc #16507: =~ vs include? or match?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16507
* Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
While working on getting the mswin build working on Actions, I thought adding mswin? and ci? methods to Minitest::Unit::Guard in tool/lib/minitest/unit.rb would be helpful.
Currently some tests are failing that are guarded/skipped based on ENV['APPVEYOR']. For ci?, I'd combine Travis, AppVeyor, & Actions.
There are quite a few instances where =~ is used for a boolean return. Would it be considered appropriate to replace those calls with include? or match?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-01-12 23:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <redmine.issue-16507.20200112232707@ruby-lang.org>
2020-01-12 23:27 ` [ruby-core:96818] [Ruby master Misc#16507] =~ vs include? or match? Greg.mpls
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).