LibrePlanet discussion list archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danny Spitzberg <stationaery@gmail.com>
To: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
Cc: "C. Cossé" <ccosse@gmail.com>,
	"Pedro Lucas Porcellis" <porcellis@eletrotupi.com>,
	fischersfritz@sent.at, libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: Re: COVID-19 testing
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:02:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEYaDQP==OiNsmxFuLFt2Fmq0+1UCQnR_Pi8oGZuDAMKoEteaw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YR1KlvXVYkbOhFTu@protected.localdomain>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2088 bytes --]

Fascism? Are you sure?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote:

> * C. Cossé <ccosse@gmail.com> [2021-08-18 20:33]:
> >    You are using proprietary software from the moment you wake up in the
> >    morning.  Even the traffic lights on your way to the pharmacy use prop
> >    software.
>
> Proprietary software may run anything, this really does not matter as
> those devices are not under ownership of the user. If it runs on
> somebody's else computer it is not affecting the user who does not own
> the computer or user's data.
>
> What matters is that third parties should not request or ask that
> people install proprietary software and run it on personal devices as
> that way people lose control over their computing.
>
> If that is so, then whichever party asks or demand by the law or some
> other rule to run the proprietary software than this party should
> guarantee by some value the functionality of software and that could
> be acceptable if the party demanding it or government, PROVIDES THE
> DEVICE, where that software would exclusively run. That is very
> similar to various devices like heart beat or pulse measurement or
> watches where inside proprietary software runs but does not affect the
> user nor user's data.
>
> As if any law is enacted to run some software then that law cannot
> demand people to buy smart phones or computers, the law must also say
> that devices will be provided to people.
>
> Though I am against such new laws, and I consider it fascism. We are
> in the new fascism area.
>
> Nobody should force people to install proprietary software on THEIR
> devices as that is abuse of human rights.
>
>
> Jean
>
> Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
> https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
>
> In support of Richard M. Stallman
> https://stallmansupport.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/plain, Size: 2424 bytes --]

   Fascism? Are you sure?

   On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote:

     * C. Cossé <[1]ccosse@gmail.com> [2021-08-18 20:33]:
     >    You are using proprietary software from the moment you wake up
     in the
     >    morning.  Even the traffic lights on your way to the pharmacy
     use prop
     >    software.
     Proprietary software may run anything, this really does not matter
     as
     those devices are not under ownership of the user. If it runs on
     somebody's else computer it is not affecting the user who does not
     own
     the computer or user's data.
     What matters is that third parties should not request or ask that
     people install proprietary software and run it on personal devices
     as
     that way people lose control over their computing.
     If that is so, then whichever party asks or demand by the law or
     some
     other rule to run the proprietary software than this party should
     guarantee by some value the functionality of software and that could
     be acceptable if the party demanding it or government, PROVIDES THE
     DEVICE, where that software would exclusively run. That is very
     similar to various devices like heart beat or pulse measurement or
     watches where inside proprietary software runs but does not affect
     the
     user nor user's data.
     As if any law is enacted to run some software then that law cannot
     demand people to buy smart phones or computers, the law must also
     say
     that devices will be provided to people.
     Though I am against such new laws, and I consider it fascism. We are
     in the new fascism area.
     Nobody should force people to install proprietary software on THEIR
     devices as that is abuse of human rights.
     Jean
     Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
     [2]https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
     In support of Richard M. Stallman
     [3]https://stallmansupport.org/
     _______________________________________________
     libreplanet-discuss mailing list
     [4]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
     [5]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus
     s

References

   1. mailto:ccosse@gmail.com
   2. https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
   3. https://stallmansupport.org/
   4. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
   5. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17 12:26 COVID-19 testing fischersfritz
2021-08-17 15:04 ` Pedro Lucas Porcellis
2021-08-17 15:14   ` fischersfritz
2021-08-18 17:30     ` C. Cossé
2021-08-18 17:59       ` Jean Louis
2021-08-19 22:02         ` Danny Spitzberg [this message]
2021-08-19 22:33           ` fischersfritz
     [not found]           ` <611edc43.1c69fb81.6f03c.bfe9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
2021-08-19 22:40             ` Danny Spitzberg
2021-08-20  5:10               ` Jean Louis
2021-08-20  5:58                 ` fischersfritz
2021-08-20 14:16                   ` Danny Spitzberg
2021-08-20 14:27                     ` fischersfritz
2021-08-20  5:04           ` Jean Louis
2021-08-20 14:28           ` Greg Farough
2021-08-18 23:24       ` jahoti via libreplanet-discuss
2021-08-19 12:56         ` fischersfritz
2021-08-20  0:56         ` jahoti via libreplanet-discuss
2021-08-20  1:41           ` fischersfritz
2021-08-20 22:46             ` jahoti via libreplanet-discuss
     [not found] ` <mailman.109.1629302443.4936.libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>
2021-08-18 23:32   ` COVID-19 testing (fischersfritz@sent.at) Arthur Torrey
2021-08-20 16:49     ` fischersfritz
2021-08-20 17:22     ` Arthur Torrey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEYaDQP==OiNsmxFuLFt2Fmq0+1UCQnR_Pi8oGZuDAMKoEteaw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stationaery@gmail.com \
    --cc=bugs@gnu.support \
    --cc=ccosse@gmail.com \
    --cc=fischersfritz@sent.at \
    --cc=libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org \
    --cc=porcellis@eletrotupi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).