Re: [PATCH v3] localedata: Add Minguo calendar support to zh_TW [BZ #24293]

[Felix Yan <felixonmars@archlinux.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1488 bytes --]

On 2019/3/6 上午7:45, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
>>  localedata/locales/cmn_TW | 4 ++++
>>  localedata/locales/hak_TW | 4 ++++
>>  localedata/locales/lzh_TW | 4 ++++
>>  localedata/locales/nan_TW | 4 ++++
>>  localedata/locales/zh_TW  | 4 ++++
>>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/localedata/locales/cmn_TW b/localedata/locales/cmn_TW
>> index cca7cc19af..9d9aca0f9e 100644
>> --- a/localedata/locales/cmn_TW
>> +++ b/localedata/locales/cmn_TW
>> @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ am_pm         "<U4E0A><U5348>";/
>>  t_fmt_ampm    "%p %I<U9EDE>%M<U5206>%S<U79D2>"
>>  % %Y年 %b %-d號 %A %H:%M:%S %Z
>>  date_fmt      "%Y<U5E74> %b %-d<U865F> %A %H:%M:%S %Z"
>> +
>> +era "+:2:1913//01//01:+*:<U6C11><U570B>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/
>> +    "+:1:1912//01//01:1912//12//31:<U6C11><U570B>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/
>> +    "+:1:1911//12//31:-*:<U6C11><U524D>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>"
>>  END LC_TIME
> 
> Do I see correctly that the content of "era" is the same in all locales?
> Please forgive me my ignorance, is this correct despite these are different
> languages?

zh_TW is locale for the writing system of Traditional Chinese in Taiwan,
while the others are for different pronunciation systems. They are
reflecting different aspects (or variants) of the same language. I
believe most users uses zh_TW and very few uses the others. The others
can be useful for a TTS system, though.

I'll correct the issues and send next version shortly.

-- 
Regards,
Felix Yan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]