From: Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: zwang@amperecomputing.com,
Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
patches@amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add LD_NUMA_REPLICATION for glibc
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:19:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTnfnSpCNJK+ZO/Y@hsj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bl5a6ul2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha:
>
> > This patch adds LD_NUMA_REPLICATION which influences the linkage of shared libraries at run time.
> >
> > If LD_NUMA_REPLICATION is set for program foo like this:
> > #LD_NUMA_REPLICATION=1 ./foo
> >
> > At the time ld.so mmaps the shared libraries, it will uses
> > mmap(, c->prot | PROT_WRITE, MAP_COPY | MAP_FILE | MAP_POPULATE,)
> > for them, and the mmap will trigger COW(copy on write) for the shared
> > libraries at the NUMA node which the program `foo` runs. After the
> > COW, the foo will have a copy of the shared library segment(mmap
> > covered) which belong to the same NUMA node.
> >
> > So when enable LD_NUMA_REPLICATION, it will consume more memory,
> > but it will reduce the remote-access in NUMA.
>
> I think the kernel could do this in a much better way, avoiding
> duplicating the pages within the same NUMA node.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=163070220429222&w=2
Since Linus did not think it a good choice to do it in kernel,
glibc is the only place to do it now.
So could you please re-evaluate this patch?
>
> The other issue is the temporary RWX mapping, which does not
> interoperate well with some security hardening features.
Could you please tell me in detail? I am confused at it.
Thanks
Huang Shijie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-03 12:14 [PATCH] Add LD_NUMA_REPLICATION for glibc Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha
2021-09-03 6:28 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-09-03 15:15 ` Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha
2021-09-03 22:16 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) via Libc-alpha
2021-09-06 9:14 ` Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha
2021-09-09 10:19 ` Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-09-10 11:01 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-09-13 14:40 ` Huang Shijie via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YTnfnSpCNJK+ZO/Y@hsj \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shijie@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zwang@amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).