Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] i386: Use generic fmod

["H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:37 PM Adhemerval Zanella Netto
<adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/03/24 15:38, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2024, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:
> >
> >> We don't really have SVID compatibility tests for any other
> >> optimization/simplification, and although I don't really oppose on
> >> adding I also thinking that this is making this change even more
> >> complicated than it would require.
> >
> > We have math/test-matherr* as generic tests of matherr working with
> > binaries that specifically use the compat symbol matherr and not with
> > newly linked binaries.  Those don't however attempt to test properties of
> > specific symbols for individual libm functions.
>
> I meant that we don't have explicit SVID tests that check its semantic
> (including return code, matherr status, stdout return code), like we do
> for some compat symbols.  And I took that this what H.J is asking about.

Yes, this is what I was asking about.  If we don't have the SVID tests, we
don't need to provide the SVID compat symbols.

-- 
H.J.