unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: "Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: "Alexandra Hájková" <ahajkova@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  Linux: Add execveat system call wrapper
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:15:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pnbpmdg9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200428122019.26826-1-ahajkova@redhat.com> ("Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha"'s message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:20:19 +0200")

So it turns out that openat and execveat have totally different flags
arguments, and translation is needed.

The execveat manual page says this:

       AT_EMPTY_PATH
              If  pathname is an empty string, operate on the file referred to
              by dirfd (which may have been obtained using the open(2)  O_PATH
              flag).

       AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW
              If  the  file  identified  by dirfd and a non-NULL pathname is a
              symbolic link, then the call fails with the error ELOOP.

fs/exec.c in the kernel sources handles flags in the do_open_execat
function:

	if ((flags & ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH)) != 0)
		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
	if (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)
		open_exec_flags.lookup_flags &= ~LOOKUP_FOLLOW;
	if (flags & AT_EMPTY_PATH)
		open_exec_flags.lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_EMPTY;

	file = do_filp_open(fd, name, &open_exec_flags);

So the manual page is correct and there are only two flags to support.

So I think we have to do this:

* If there are more flags than just the two, fail with EINVAL.

* To handle AT_EMPTY_PATH, do not open a new file descriptor (using
  openat) if AT_EMPTY_PATH is specified *and* the file name is "".

* To handle AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, openat needs to be called with
  O_NOFOLLOW in that case (in addition to O_CLOEXEC).

The behavior with AT_EMPTY_PATH/"" and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW at the same
time is not immedately obvious from the kernel code, so I wrote a small
test program (/bin/sh is a symbolic link to /bin/bash on this system):

#include <err.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int
main (void)
{
  int fd = open ("/bin/sh", O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW);
  if (fd < 0)
    err (1, "open");
  static char *const argv[] = { "sh", "-c", "exit 0", NULL };
  static char *const envp[] = { NULL };
  syscall (SYS_execveat, fd, "", argv, envp,
           AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
  err (1, "execveat");
}

This fails:

openat(AT_FDCWD, "/bin/sh", O_RDONLY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_PATH) = 3
execveat(3, "", ["sh", "-c", "exit 0"], 0x402040 /* 0 vars */, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW|AT_EMPTY_PATH) = -1 ELOOP (Too many levels of symbolic links)
[…]
execveat-opath-symlink: execveat: Too many levels of symbolic links

So I think for the AT_EMPTY_PATH/"" and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW case, we
need to call fstatat64 with AT_EMPTY_PATH and see if st_mode indicates
that the descriptor refers to a symbolic link.  If it does, the function
needs to fail with ELOOP.

AT_EMPTY_PATH without a "" file name does not need special treatment and
can use the regular openat path (with the conditional setting of
O_NOFOLLOW).

Thanks,
Florian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-28 12:20 [PATCH] Linux: Add execveat system call wrapper Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2020-04-28 14:17 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 15:03   ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 15:03 ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 15:08   ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 15:29     ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 17:15       ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 17:19         ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 17:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-04-28 17:50   ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 18:31     ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-04-30 11:15 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha [this message]
2020-04-30 12:28   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-04-30 12:55     ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-04-30 19:03       ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-04-30 12:32 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-11-06 21:03 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2020-11-06 22:15   ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-09 18:43     ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-11-09 21:34   ` Yann Droneaud
2020-11-26 11:31     ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova via Libc-alpha
2020-11-09 20:39 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-12-03 13:55   ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-11-26 21:28 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2020-11-27 14:58   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-11-27 17:32     ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-11-27 17:38       ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-12-03 14:20 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2020-12-03 14:37   ` Andreas Schwab
2020-12-08 14:44   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-12-08 15:18     ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-12-08 16:41       ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-03-15 21:42 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-03-15 22:12   ` Joseph Myers
2021-03-15 22:17   ` Dmitry V. Levin
2021-03-24 13:54 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-03-26 20:36   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-04-02 12:13     ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-04-02 13:29       ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-04-05 16:32 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-04-12 10:26   ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-04-12 11:14   ` Andreas Schwab
2021-04-12 19:26 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-04-13 19:27   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-04-21 18:11 ` Alexandra Hájková via Libc-alpha
2021-05-03 19:20   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pnbpmdg9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ahajkova@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).