* [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
@ 2021-08-06 9:42 Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-11 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha @ 2021-08-06 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GLIBC patches; +Cc: Openrisc
On the port of OpenRISC I am working on and it appears the rv32 port
we have sets __TIMESIZE == 64 && __WORDSIZE == 32. This causes the
size of time_t to be 8 bytes, but the tv_sec in the kernel is still 32-bit
causing truncation.
The truncations are unavoidable on these systems so skip the
testing/failures by guarding with __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64.
Also, futher in the tests and in other parts of code checking for time_t
overflow does not work on 32-bit systems when time_t is 64-bit. As
suggested by Adhemerval, update the in_time_t_range function to assume
32-bits by using int32_t.
This also brings in the header for stdint.h so we can update other
usages of __int32_t to int32_t as suggested by Adhemerval.
---
Hello,
Sorry for the delay to get this out I have been busy on the hardware side of
openrisc the last month so I haven't been able to spend time on getting this
out.
The patch ends up doing a test fix and some lib code fixes, I can split it to
separate small patches. But since as a whole it's small I feel leaving it
together is best.
-Stafford
include/time.h | 10 ++++++----
time/tst-itimer.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/time.h b/include/time.h
index 4372bfbd96..ba3c5116cf 100644
--- a/include/time.h
+++ b/include/time.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
# include <sys/time.h>
# include <time-clockid.h>
# include <sys/time.h>
+# include <stdint.h>
extern __typeof (strftime_l) __strftime_l;
libc_hidden_proto (__strftime_l)
@@ -334,11 +335,12 @@ libc_hidden_proto (__time64)
actual clock ID. */
#define CLOCK_IDFIELD_SIZE 3
-/* Check whether T fits in time_t. */
+/* Check whether T fits in int32_t, assume all usages are for
+ sizeof(time_t) == 32. */
static inline bool
in_time_t_range (__time64_t t)
{
- time_t s = t;
+ int32_t s = t;
return s == t;
}
@@ -445,8 +447,8 @@ timespec64_to_timeval64 (const struct __timespec64 ts64)
and suseconds_t. */
struct __timeval32
{
- __int32_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */
- __int32_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */
+ int32_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */
+ int32_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */
};
/* Conversion functions for converting to/from __timeval32 */
diff --git a/time/tst-itimer.c b/time/tst-itimer.c
index 929c2b74c7..bd7d7afe83 100644
--- a/time/tst-itimer.c
+++ b/time/tst-itimer.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ do_test (void)
/* Linux does not provide 64 bit time_t support for getitimer and
setitimer on architectures with 32 bit time_t support. */
- if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
+ if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
{
TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &(struct itimerval) { 0 },
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ do_test (void)
it.it_interval.tv_usec = 20;
it.it_value.tv_sec = 30;
it.it_value.tv_usec = 40;
- if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
+ if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
{
TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-06 9:42 [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
@ 2021-08-11 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-08-14 22:24 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha @ 2021-08-11 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stafford Horne, GLIBC patches; +Cc: Openrisc
On 06/08/2021 06:42, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On the port of OpenRISC I am working on and it appears the rv32 port
> we have sets __TIMESIZE == 64 && __WORDSIZE == 32. This causes the
> size of time_t to be 8 bytes, but the tv_sec in the kernel is still 32-bit
> causing truncation.
>
> The truncations are unavoidable on these systems so skip the
> testing/failures by guarding with __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64.
>
> Also, futher in the tests and in other parts of code checking for time_t
> overflow does not work on 32-bit systems when time_t is 64-bit. As
> suggested by Adhemerval, update the in_time_t_range function to assume
> 32-bits by using int32_t.
>
> This also brings in the header for stdint.h so we can update other
> usages of __int32_t to int32_t as suggested by Adhemerval.
> ---
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the delay to get this out I have been busy on the hardware side of
> openrisc the last month so I haven't been able to spend time on getting this
> out.
>
> The patch ends up doing a test fix and some lib code fixes, I can split it to
> separate small patches. But since as a whole it's small I feel leaving it
> together is best.
LGTM, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
>
> -Stafford
>
> include/time.h | 10 ++++++----
> time/tst-itimer.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/time.h b/include/time.h
> index 4372bfbd96..ba3c5116cf 100644
> --- a/include/time.h
> +++ b/include/time.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> # include <sys/time.h>
> # include <time-clockid.h>
> # include <sys/time.h>
> +# include <stdint.h>
>
> extern __typeof (strftime_l) __strftime_l;
> libc_hidden_proto (__strftime_l)
> @@ -334,11 +335,12 @@ libc_hidden_proto (__time64)
> actual clock ID. */
> #define CLOCK_IDFIELD_SIZE 3
>
> -/* Check whether T fits in time_t. */
> +/* Check whether T fits in int32_t, assume all usages are for
> + sizeof(time_t) == 32. */
> static inline bool
> in_time_t_range (__time64_t t)
> {
> - time_t s = t;
> + int32_t s = t;
> return s == t;
> }
>
> @@ -445,8 +447,8 @@ timespec64_to_timeval64 (const struct __timespec64 ts64)
> and suseconds_t. */
> struct __timeval32
> {
> - __int32_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */
> - __int32_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */
> + int32_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */
> + int32_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */
> };
>
> /* Conversion functions for converting to/from __timeval32 */
> diff --git a/time/tst-itimer.c b/time/tst-itimer.c
> index 929c2b74c7..bd7d7afe83 100644
> --- a/time/tst-itimer.c
> +++ b/time/tst-itimer.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ do_test (void)
>
> /* Linux does not provide 64 bit time_t support for getitimer and
> setitimer on architectures with 32 bit time_t support. */
> - if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
> + if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
> {
> TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
> TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &(struct itimerval) { 0 },
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ do_test (void)
> it.it_interval.tv_usec = 20;
> it.it_value.tv_sec = 30;
> it.it_value.tv_usec = 40;
> - if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
> + if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
> {
> TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-11 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
@ 2021-08-14 22:24 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-16 17:12 ` Joseph Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha @ 2021-08-14 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adhemerval Zanella; +Cc: Openrisc, GLIBC patches
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 05:30:40PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2021 06:42, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > On the port of OpenRISC I am working on and it appears the rv32 port
> > we have sets __TIMESIZE == 64 && __WORDSIZE == 32. This causes the
> > size of time_t to be 8 bytes, but the tv_sec in the kernel is still 32-bit
> > causing truncation.
> >
> > The truncations are unavoidable on these systems so skip the
> > testing/failures by guarding with __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64.
> >
> > Also, futher in the tests and in other parts of code checking for time_t
> > overflow does not work on 32-bit systems when time_t is 64-bit. As
> > suggested by Adhemerval, update the in_time_t_range function to assume
> > 32-bits by using int32_t.
> >
> > This also brings in the header for stdint.h so we can update other
> > usages of __int32_t to int32_t as suggested by Adhemerval.
> > ---
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay to get this out I have been busy on the hardware side of
> > openrisc the last month so I haven't been able to spend time on getting this
> > out.
> >
> > The patch ends up doing a test fix and some lib code fixes, I can split it to
> > separate small patches. But since as a whole it's small I feel leaving it
> > together is best.
>
> LGTM, thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Thanks for the review.
> >
> > -Stafford
> >
> > include/time.h | 10 ++++++----
> > time/tst-itimer.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/time.h b/include/time.h
> > index 4372bfbd96..ba3c5116cf 100644
> > --- a/include/time.h
> > +++ b/include/time.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > # include <sys/time.h>
> > # include <time-clockid.h>
> > # include <sys/time.h>
> > +# include <stdint.h>
> >
> > extern __typeof (strftime_l) __strftime_l;
> > libc_hidden_proto (__strftime_l)
> > @@ -334,11 +335,12 @@ libc_hidden_proto (__time64)
> > actual clock ID. */
> > #define CLOCK_IDFIELD_SIZE 3
> >
> > -/* Check whether T fits in time_t. */
> > +/* Check whether T fits in int32_t, assume all usages are for
> > + sizeof(time_t) == 32. */
> > static inline bool
> > in_time_t_range (__time64_t t)
> > {
> > - time_t s = t;
> > + int32_t s = t;
> > return s == t;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -445,8 +447,8 @@ timespec64_to_timeval64 (const struct __timespec64 ts64)
> > and suseconds_t. */
> > struct __timeval32
> > {
> > - __int32_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */
> > - __int32_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */
> > + int32_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */
> > + int32_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */
> > };
> >
> > /* Conversion functions for converting to/from __timeval32 */
> > diff --git a/time/tst-itimer.c b/time/tst-itimer.c
> > index 929c2b74c7..bd7d7afe83 100644
> > --- a/time/tst-itimer.c
> > +++ b/time/tst-itimer.c
> > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ do_test (void)
> >
> > /* Linux does not provide 64 bit time_t support for getitimer and
> > setitimer on architectures with 32 bit time_t support. */
> > - if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
> > + if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
> > {
> > TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
> > TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &(struct itimerval) { 0 },
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ do_test (void)
> > it.it_interval.tv_usec = 20;
> > it.it_value.tv_sec = 30;
> > it.it_value.tv_usec = 40;
> > - if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
> > + if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
> > {
> > TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
> >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-14 22:24 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
@ 2021-08-16 17:12 ` Joseph Myers
2021-08-16 21:54 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2021-08-16 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stafford Horne; +Cc: Openrisc, GLIBC patches
I'm seeing a build failure in the glibc testsuite for i686-gnu:
tst-itimer.c: In function 'do_test':
tst-itimer.c:103:11: error: '__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64' undeclared (first use in this function)
103 | if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tst-itimer.c:103:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-testresults/2021q3/008412.html
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-16 17:12 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2021-08-16 21:54 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-16 22:32 ` Joseph Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha @ 2021-08-16 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph Myers; +Cc: Openrisc, GLIBC patches
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:12:04PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I'm seeing a build failure in the glibc testsuite for i686-gnu:
>
> tst-itimer.c: In function 'do_test':
> tst-itimer.c:103:11: error: '__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 103 | if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tst-itimer.c:103:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-testresults/2021q3/008412.html
Right sorry about that, so __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 only exists in
linux.
So it looks like for non linux the new timer test changes break.
Should we provide __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 for not linux builds,
or remove __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 from the itimer test again?
The reason for using __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 is to pick up the
timeval size which is different on each architecture.
Maybe the easiest is adding something like:
#ifndef __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64
#define __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
#endif
To the top of tst-itimer.c. Sorry I don't have time right now to send a patch
or test this.
-Stafford
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-16 21:54 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
@ 2021-08-16 22:32 ` Joseph Myers
2021-08-17 23:33 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2021-08-16 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stafford Horne; +Cc: Openrisc, GLIBC patches
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Should we provide __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 for not linux builds,
> or remove __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 from the itimer test again?
> The reason for using __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 is to pick up the
> timeval size which is different on each architecture.
I'd suggest having a macro that doesn't refer to either "kernel" or "old
timeval" (and that is defined for both Linux and Hurd). As far as I
understand, the logical concept that's relevant for this test isn't either
one of those, it's more like "setitimer supports times that cannot be
represented in 32 bits".
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-16 22:32 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2021-08-17 23:33 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-19 12:46 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha @ 2021-08-17 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph Myers; +Cc: Openrisc, GLIBC patches
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021, 7:33 AM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote:
>
> > Should we provide __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 for not linux
> builds,
> > or remove __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 from the itimer test
> again?
> > The reason for using __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 is to pick
> up the
> > timeval size which is different on each architecture.
>
> I'd suggest having a macro that doesn't refer to either "kernel" or "old
> timeval" (and that is defined for both Linux and Hurd). As far as I
> understand, the logical concept that's relevant for this test isn't either
> one of those, it's more like "setitimer supports times that cannot be
> represented in 32 bits".
>
Hello,
That makes sense, currently with the hurd build being broken how urgent is
this? I worked on reproducing the build issue with build-many but didn't
get it working yet, probably about 80% there before I ran out of time.
I'll try to get it fixed in a few days as my top priority, but I only have
an hour or two a day to look at it. If we need to revert or add a temporary
patch please feel free.
-stafford
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
2021-08-17 23:33 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
@ 2021-08-19 12:46 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha @ 2021-08-19 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha
On 17/08/2021 20:33, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021, 7:33 AM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>
>>> Should we provide __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 for not linux
>> builds,
>>> or remove __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 from the itimer test
>> again?
>>> The reason for using __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 is to pick
>> up the
>>> timeval size which is different on each architecture.
>>
>> I'd suggest having a macro that doesn't refer to either "kernel" or "old
>> timeval" (and that is defined for both Linux and Hurd). As far as I
>> understand, the logical concept that's relevant for this test isn't either
>> one of those, it's more like "setitimer supports times that cannot be
>> represented in 32 bits".
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> That makes sense, currently with the hurd build being broken how urgent is
> this? I worked on reproducing the build issue with build-many but didn't
> get it working yet, probably about 80% there before I ran out of time.
>
> I'll try to get it fixed in a few days as my top priority, but I only have
> an hour or two a day to look at it. If we need to revert or add a temporary
> patch please feel free.
The most straightforward would be to add a libsupport routine to abstract
what Joseph has suggested:
support/xtime.h:
bool support_setitimer_support_64_bit (void);
And return 0 for hurd and __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64 for Linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-19 12:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-06 9:42 [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-11 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-08-14 22:24 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-16 17:12 ` Joseph Myers
2021-08-16 21:54 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-16 22:32 ` Joseph Myers
2021-08-17 23:33 ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-19 12:46 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).