unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	GLIBC patches <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:30:40 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f577bc8-bef8-6c06-aaa9-57bf16d8443b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806094217.3227877-1-shorne@gmail.com>



On 06/08/2021 06:42, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On the port of OpenRISC I am working on and it appears the rv32 port
> we have sets __TIMESIZE == 64 && __WORDSIZE == 32.  This causes the
> size of time_t to be 8 bytes, but the tv_sec in the kernel is still 32-bit
> causing truncation.
> 
> The truncations are unavoidable on these systems so skip the
> testing/failures by guarding with __KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64.
> 
> Also, futher in the tests and in other parts of code checking for time_t
> overflow does not work on 32-bit systems when time_t is 64-bit.  As
> suggested by Adhemerval, update the in_time_t_range function to assume
> 32-bits by using int32_t.
> 
> This also brings in the header for stdint.h so we can update other
> usages of __int32_t to int32_t as suggested by Adhemerval.
> ---
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Sorry for the delay to get this out I have been busy on the hardware side of
> openrisc the last month so I haven't been able to spend time on getting this
> out.
> 
> The patch ends up doing a test fix and some lib code fixes, I can split it to
> separate small patches.  But since as a whole it's small I feel leaving it
> together is best.

LGTM, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

> 
> -Stafford
> 
>  include/time.h    | 10 ++++++----
>  time/tst-itimer.c |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/time.h b/include/time.h
> index 4372bfbd96..ba3c5116cf 100644
> --- a/include/time.h
> +++ b/include/time.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  # include <sys/time.h>
>  # include <time-clockid.h>
>  # include <sys/time.h>
> +# include <stdint.h>
>  
>  extern __typeof (strftime_l) __strftime_l;
>  libc_hidden_proto (__strftime_l)
> @@ -334,11 +335,12 @@ libc_hidden_proto (__time64)
>     actual clock ID.  */
>  #define CLOCK_IDFIELD_SIZE	3
>  
> -/* Check whether T fits in time_t.  */
> +/* Check whether T fits in int32_t, assume all usages are for
> +   sizeof(time_t) == 32.  */
>  static inline bool
>  in_time_t_range (__time64_t t)
>  {
> -  time_t s = t;
> +  int32_t s = t;
>    return s == t;
>  }
>  
> @@ -445,8 +447,8 @@ timespec64_to_timeval64 (const struct __timespec64 ts64)
>     and suseconds_t.  */
>  struct __timeval32
>  {
> -  __int32_t tv_sec;         /* Seconds.  */
> -  __int32_t tv_usec;        /* Microseconds.  */
> +  int32_t tv_sec;         /* Seconds.  */
> +  int32_t tv_usec;        /* Microseconds.  */
>  };
>  
>  /* Conversion functions for converting to/from __timeval32  */
> diff --git a/time/tst-itimer.c b/time/tst-itimer.c
> index 929c2b74c7..bd7d7afe83 100644
> --- a/time/tst-itimer.c
> +++ b/time/tst-itimer.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ do_test (void)
>  
>        /* Linux does not provide 64 bit time_t support for getitimer and
>  	 setitimer on architectures with 32 bit time_t support.  */
> -      if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
> +      if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
>  	{
>  	  TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
>  	  TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &(struct itimerval) { 0 },
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ do_test (void)
>        it.it_interval.tv_usec = 20;
>        it.it_value.tv_sec = 30;
>        it.it_value.tv_usec = 40;
> -      if (sizeof (__time_t) == 8)
> +      if (__KERNEL_OLD_TIMEVAL_MATCHES_TIMEVAL64)
>  	{
>  	  TEST_COMPARE (setitimer (timers[i], &it, NULL), 0);
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-11 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06  9:42 [PATCH v2] time: Fix overflow itimer tests on 32-bit systems Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-11 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-08-14 22:24   ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-16 17:12     ` Joseph Myers
2021-08-16 21:54       ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-16 22:32         ` Joseph Myers
2021-08-17 23:33           ` Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha
2021-08-19 12:46             ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f577bc8-bef8-6c06-aaa9-57bf16d8443b@linaro.org \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).