Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2021, #02; Tue, 3)

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> How would it be forgotten? If you introduce tests like the ones changed
> in 1/3 of the series and expect git to pay attention to COLUMNS you'll
> find that they won't work, because if you set COLUMNS=123 we won't take
> it over the GIT_TEST_COLUMNS=80 set in test-lib.sh.
> ...
> ...I'd be happy to remove the helper if Junio would take that version of
> the patch; :)

FWIW, I didn't *request* it; the resulting test scripts that set and
unset both the standard COLUMNS and another test-only environment
variable looked typo-prone and hard to read, and that is why I
suggested to hide that behind a helper.

If we do not have to add a test-only enviroment variable at all, I
do not see the reason why we need a helper.

> By narrowly targeting a fix at one specific shell's cleverness around
> COLUMNS we'll leave open a window where we'll fail on other shells if
> they introduce similar cleverness.
>
> It hardly seems like a stretch that once bash starts doing that sort of
> thing other shells might think to follow suit, and all have their own
> non-standard way to turn it off.

Hmph. Wouldn't the same argument apply to the much simpler single
liner "shopt -u" solution?  When writing new tests, there is nothing
to remember, and a new shell that needs a different trick to defeat
the auto-COLUMNS would be detected quickly by running the tests in a
terminal whose width is different from 80, no?

> You also didn't address the other rationale for it, namely that it's
> also future-proofing us for submarine breakages in non-git programs
> which'll understand the new COLUMNS=10, but not GIT_TEST_COLUMNS=80.

Isn't that another downside of the approach you are advocating?

If we make Git rely on GIT_TEST_COLUMNS, we may honor it while
everybody else ignores it.  If we only have to deal with COLUMNS
like everybody else does, Git and other tools that are used in our
tests will be affected the same way by overly-clever shells, no?