Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git wiki

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>]

On Wed, 3 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > Even if I think the git mailing list itself is very responsive, I think 
> > the hg people were just more directly and actively involved. For git, they 
> > had to come to us.
> 
> That is _very_ unfair to me.  It is not like git and hg both
> submitted proposals to be chosen by them and then we dropped the
> ball by not supporting them properly.  They have to come to us.

Oh, sorry, I didn't mean it in that way. Of _course_ they should have come 
to us with their issues.

So I don't think git was doing anything wrong there, I was just stating it 
as a neutral fact, rather than any criticism - the hg people were involved 
(and I think they were pushing it), and the git people weren't, because 
they never came to us.

Not a big deal. I actually think we'll be better off with some competition 
to keep us on our toes.

			Linus