Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git wiki

[Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>]

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:56:59PM -0400, linux@horizon.com wrote:
> What people who are asking for explicit rename tracking actually want
> is automatic rename merging.  If branch A renames a file, and branch B
> corrects a typo on a comment somewhere, they'd like the merge to
> both patch and rename the file.  If you can do that, you have met the
> need, even if your solution isn't the one the feature requester
> imagined.

I don't know if you already know this, if you do it might be valuable
for other readers.

If the rename is detected by the current rename detection code
(git-diff-tree -M) then the merge case described above is handled
perfectly fine by the current git. That is, the rename is followed and
the patch fixing the typo is applied to the renamed file. This assumes
that the default merge strategy (recursive) is used.


- Fredrik