From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org, mercurial@selenic.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:24:27 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0505121709250.30848-100000@iabervon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050512205735.GE5914@waste.org>
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Does this need an HTTP request (and round trip) per object? It appears
> to. That's 2200 requests/round trips for my 800 patch benchmark.
It requires a request per object, but it should be possible (with
somewhat more complicated code) to overlap them such that it doesn't
require a serial round trip for each. Since the server is sending static
files, the overhead for each should be minimal.
> How does git find the outstanding changesets?
In the present mainline, you first have to find the head commit you
want. I have a patch which does this for you over the same
connection. Starting from that point, it tracks reachability on the
receiving end, and requests anything it doesn't have.
For the case of having nothing to do, it should be a single one-line
request/response for a static file (after which the local end determines
that it has everything it needs without talking to the server).
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-12 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-12 9:44 Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 18:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 20:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 20:14 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 20:57 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 21:24 ` Daniel Barkalow [this message]
2005-05-12 22:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13 0:33 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-13 1:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13 2:23 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-13 2:44 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13 5:44 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-15 8:54 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-15 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-15 11:22 Adam J. Richter
2005-05-15 12:40 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-16 22:22 ` Tristan Wibberley
2005-05-15 17:39 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-15 18:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-16 1:12 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-16 9:29 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-05-15 11:52 Adam J. Richter
2005-05-15 14:23 ` Petr Baudis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0505121709250.30848-100000@iabervon.org \
--to=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mercurial@selenic.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).