git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, mercurial@selenic.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 08:22:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050515062243.GA22021@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050512182340.GA324@pasky.ji.cz>


* Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:

> > Mercurial is also much smarter than rsync at determining what
> > outstanding changesets exist. Here's an empty pull as a demonstration:
> > 
> >  $ time hg merge hg://selenic.com/linux-hg/
> >  retrieving changegroup
> > 
> >  real    0m0.363s
> >  user    0m0.083s
> >  sys     0m0.007s
> > 
> > That's a single http request and a one line response.
> 
> So, what about comparing it with something comparable, say git pull 
> over HTTP? :-)

Matt, did you get around to do such a comparison?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-15  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-12  9:44 Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 18:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 20:11   ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 20:14     ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 20:57       ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 21:24         ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-12 22:29           ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13  0:33             ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-13  1:11               ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13  2:23                 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-13  2:44                   ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13  5:44           ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-15  8:54         ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-15  6:22   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-15 11:22 Adam J. Richter
2005-05-15 12:40 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-16 22:22   ` Tristan Wibberley
2005-05-15 17:39 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-15 18:23   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-16  1:12     ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-16  9:29 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-05-15 11:52 Adam J. Richter
2005-05-15 14:23 ` Petr Baudis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050515062243.GA22021@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mercurial@selenic.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).