From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>,
pasky@ucw.cz, git@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mercurial@selenic.com, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:23:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <428793A1.5070004@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050515173923.GK5914@waste.org>
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:22:19AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:54:05 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>>
>>>Dear diary, on Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:57:35PM CEST, I got a letter
>>>where Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> told me that...
>>>
>>>>Does this need an HTTP request (and round trip) per object? It appears
>>>>to. That's 2200 requests/round trips for my 800 patch benchmark.
>>
>>>Yes it does. On the other side, it needs no server-side CGI. But I guess
>>>it should be pretty easy to write some kind of server-side CGI streamer,
>>>and it would then easily take just a single HTTP request (telling the
>>>server the commit ID and receiving back all the objects).
>>
>> I don't understand what was wrong with Jeff Garzik's previous
>>suggestion of using http/1.1 pipelining to coalesce the round trips.
>
>
> You can't do pipelining if you can't look ahead far enough to fill the pipe.
Even if you cannot fill a pipeline, HTTP/1.1 is sufficiently useful
simply by removing the per-request connection overhead.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-15 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-15 11:22 Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull Adam J. Richter
2005-05-15 12:40 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-16 22:22 ` Tristan Wibberley
2005-05-15 17:39 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-15 18:23 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-05-16 1:12 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-16 9:29 ` Matthias Urlichs
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-15 11:52 Adam J. Richter
2005-05-15 14:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 9:44 Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 18:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 20:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 20:14 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-12 20:57 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-12 21:24 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-12 22:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13 0:33 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-13 1:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13 2:23 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-05-13 2:44 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-13 5:44 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-15 8:54 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-15 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=428793A1.5070004@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mercurial@selenic.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).