From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 18:25:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mLoeO5fKezE5S1LEC2LNH9qCwxHnNi_ZJpYzC7rVTqmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8CQRWU0mFLVD6RrpzJiHBH=9zFwf5xDo7UhGW6A-OAzuw@mail.gmail.com>
Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> until libgit.a == libgit2. Done.
>
> Read up about the introduction of libgit2, why it was created in the
> first place instead of moving a few files around renaming libgit.a to
> libgit2.a. Unless you have a different definition of "==" than I do.
As far as I know, there was never an extensive on-list discussion
about why git.git cannot be lib'ified. The first appearance of
libgit2 is here [1]. I briefly read through the initial history of
libgit2.git too, but I cannot find a single discussion detailing why
lib'ifying git.git is fundamentally unworkable (there's some vague
mention of "global state baggage" and "presence of die()", but that's
about it). Unless you can point to some detailed discussions, or
write out a really good reason yourself, I don't think there's any
harm in letting fc try. Ofcourse, he still indicated any sort of plan
yet, and I'm also waiting for that.
[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99608
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-08 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 22:16 [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer Felipe Contreras
2013-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] log-tree: remove dependency from sequencer Felipe Contreras
2013-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 2:35 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-06-08 10:14 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 11:42 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-06-08 12:25 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 12:34 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-06-08 12:55 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2013-06-08 13:15 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-06-08 13:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 13:34 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-08 14:10 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 14:10 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-06-08 14:20 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 4:34 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 9:58 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 17:55 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 18:06 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 18:11 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 18:22 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 18:29 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 18:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 18:49 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 18:54 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 18:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 12:09 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 13:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 16:49 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-06-08 17:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 17:34 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-06-08 17:44 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 19:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 1:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-06-09 2:17 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 3:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-06-09 3:34 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 5:26 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 12:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 17:40 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 18:01 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 18:10 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 18:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 19:11 ` Johan Herland
2013-06-09 19:29 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 21:42 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-06-09 23:40 ` Stefano Lattarini
2013-06-10 5:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 9:05 ` Bad attitudes and problems in the Git community (was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin) Stefano Lattarini
2013-06-10 16:58 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 18:11 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2013-06-10 18:33 ` Martin Langhoff
2013-06-10 18:40 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2013-06-10 21:34 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 5:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 9:18 ` Andres Freund
2013-06-11 9:29 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-20 21:11 ` Thiago Farina
2013-06-09 17:53 ` Thomas Rast
2013-06-09 18:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 12:48 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 13:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 18:04 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 18:32 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 18:45 ` Jeff King
2013-06-09 19:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-06-09 20:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 20:34 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-10 5:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 8:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-10 16:53 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 16:55 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 17:34 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-06-10 18:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-10 21:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 18:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 19:25 ` Thomas Rast
2013-06-09 19:54 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 20:02 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 3:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] Move sequencer Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-08 10:26 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALkWK0mLoeO5fKezE5S1LEC2LNH9qCwxHnNi_ZJpYzC7rVTqmg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=drafnel@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).