Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

[Matheus Tavares Bernardino <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>]

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:32 AM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:23 AM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder
> > <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store
> > > > objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are
> > > > created by[3]:
> > > >
> > > > 1. listing objects;
> > > > 2. sorting the list with some good heuristics;
> > > > 3. traversing the list with a sliding window to find similar objects in
> > > > the window, in order to do delta decomposing;
> > > > 4. compress the objects with zlib and write them to the packfile.
> > > >
> > > > What we are calling pack access code in this document, is the set of
> > > > functions responsible for retrieving the objects stored at the
> > > > packfiles. This process consists, roughly speaking, in three parts:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Locate and read the blob from packfile, using the index file;
> > > > 2. If the blob is a delta, locate and read the base object to apply the
> > > > delta on top of it;
> > > > 3. Once the full content is read, decompress it (using zlib inflate).
> > > >
> > > > Note: There is a delta cache for the second step so that if another
> > > > delta depends on the same base object, it is already in memory. This
> > > > cache is global; also, the sliding windows, are global per packfile.
> > >
> > > Yeah, but the sliding windows are used only when creating pack files,
> > > not when reading them, right?
> >
> > These windows are actually for reading. We used to just mmap the whole
> > pack file in the early days but that was impossible for 4+ GB packs on
> > 32-bit platforms, which was one of the reasons, I think, that sliding
> > windows were added, to map just the parts we want to read.
>
> To clarify (I think I see why you mentioned pack creation now), there
> are actually two window concepts. core.packedGitWindowSize is about
> reading pack files. pack.window is for generating pack files. The
> second window should already be thread-safe since we do all the
> heuristics to find best base object candidates in threads.

I was indeed confusing this two concepts, thanks for clarifying it! I
took a quick look around the usage of core.packedGitWindowSize arround
the code (at packfile.c) and it seems to be already thread-safe (I may
be wrong thought).

> --
> Duy